Re: libpng gnome slink

1999-01-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Brian Almeida wrote: Stephen Crowley (aka Crow-) is. Euh, isn't Jim Pick going to package the new GNOME as well? Wichert. -- == This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert

Re: libpng gnome slink

1999-01-19 Thread Havoc Pennington
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Stephen Crowley wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: and how the unfortunate of us who already have upgraded to 1.0.2 can downgrade, i see the 1.0.1 package nowhere ...

Re: libpng gnome slink

1999-01-19 Thread Jim Pick
Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Stephen Crowley wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: and how the unfortunate of us who already have upgraded to 1.0.2 can

Re: libpng gnome slink

1999-01-18 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Brian Almeida wrote: Because the Imlib maintainer (me) has a permanent hold on those packages in dselect :) Me too!! Yes. I second this. RedHat and others have already moved back. Let's not break all

Re: libpng gnome slink

1999-01-18 Thread Brian Almeida
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: and how the unfortunate of us who already have upgraded to 1.0.2 can downgrade, i see the 1.0.1 package nowhere ... bma !find libpng2 hamm dpkg bma: um, dists/hamm/hamm/binary-i386/libs/libpng2_1.0.0-0.1.deb what about latest gnome

Re: libpng gnome slink

1999-01-18 Thread Stephen Crowley
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: and how the unfortunate of us who already have upgraded to 1.0.2 can downgrade, i see the 1.0.1 package nowhere ... bma !find libpng2 hamm dpkg bma: um,