Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi.. out of curiosity, does anyone know what's keeping the new libusb out of
testing? I can't find anything useful in update_excuses.html and I can't
make sense of the lines in update_output.txt.
The (obvious) problems were :
- sane-backends/sane
The (obvious) problems were :
- sane-backends/sane-frontends RC bugs
- gphoto2 not building on arm
- kdegraphics not building on arm
Well, not obvious since they were already fixed AFAICT (unless I'm more
incompetent than I thought).
The hidden problems were :
- pencam depending on
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The (obvious) problems were :
- sane-backends/sane-frontends RC bugs
- gphoto2 not building on arm
- kdegraphics not building on arm
Well, not obvious since they were already fixed AFAICT (unless I'm more
incompetent than I thought).
Yes, I was
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:16:32AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi.. out of curiosity, does anyone know what's keeping the new libusb out
of
testing? I can't find anything useful in update_excuses.html and I can't
make sense of the lines
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:20:35PM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
-snip-
It is currently not possible to compile a working gphoto2 in unstable
without previously recompiling libusb.
Otherwise it segfault early because usb_busses (from libusb.so) is not
understood by gphoto2.
I believe it is a
Chris,
I (christophe) am the packager of gphoto2.
The bug you mention is not related with the NEW problem.
It is impossible to compile something working (gphoto2 or something
else) with the current libusb packages. This is not your fault at
all. I can't explain it but something goes wrong between
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:00:54PM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
Chris,
I (christophe) am the packager of gphoto2.
The bug you mention is not related with the NEW problem.
It is impossible to compile something working (gphoto2 or something
else) with the current libusb packages. This is
Hi.. out of curiosity, does anyone know what's keeping the new libusb out of
testing? I can't find anything useful in update_excuses.html and I can't
make sense of the lines in update_output.txt.
I ask because it seems to be holding a fair few things up (my particular
concern is that it's
8 matches
Mail list logo
