On May 12, 2014, at 05:46 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>Mailman 3 is completely different from Mailman 3 and I see no synergy in
>basing anything on the existing package. As of now, to my knowledge no
>migration or upgrade scenarios exist from MM 2 to MM 3, and I'm not sure
>if such code will be the
On Mon, May 12, 2014 17:00, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:02:35AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> I don't have time to work on Alioth, but JFTR, we (the GNU Mailman
>> development team) recently announced the first full-suite beta release
>> for Mailman 3. It's possible that even wi
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:02:35AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I don't have time to work on Alioth, but JFTR, we (the GNU Mailman development
> team) recently announced the first full-suite beta release for Mailman 3.
> It's possible that even with the usual beta-quality issues, that MM3 would
> m
3 matches
Mail list logo