On 2012-01-31 18:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently fail the
piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in wheezy and sid.
As ucf became transitively essential in the mean time, this mass bug
filing is postponed until this problem
]] Roger Leigh
Just FYI, please see #659451. I've split the UTC variable into
/etc/default/hwclock, which means /etc/default/rcS can become a
regular dpkg conffile (in current git only for now). This needs
support in d-i clock-setup (done) and util-linux (pending) before
upload.
I really
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:14:49AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Roger Leigh
Just FYI, please see #659451. I've split the UTC variable into
/etc/default/hwclock, which means /etc/default/rcS can become a
regular dpkg conffile (in current git only for now). This needs
support in
]] Roger Leigh
Line 3: UTC or LOCAL. Tells whether the Hardware Clock is set to
Coordinated Universal Time or local time. You can always override
this value with options on the hwclock command line.
If you saw my mail of a couple of days ago, I have made patches
for util-linux
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:07:22PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few
days ago, which makes ucf
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:18:08PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a
few
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a
few
days ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
[...]
Well, I would argue
Hi,
I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently fail the
piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in wheezy and sid.
Currently 22 binary packages from 16 source packages are affected.
Most of these errors happen during the 'postrm purge' phase because
non-essential
On 31.01.2012 18:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently fail the
piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in wheezy and sid.
Currently 22 binary packages from 16 source packages are affected.
Most of these errors happen
On 01/31/2012 08:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 31.01.2012 18:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently
fail the piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in
wheezy and sid. Currently 22 binary packages from 16 source
packages
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few
days ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
Unless you are going to argue to add it to the essential set, I can't
see why that matters. It's still wrong to use
Hi,
On Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, Michael Biebl wrote:
Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few days
ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
where was this discussed/announced?
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few
days ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
Unless you are going to argue to add it to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
