Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is;
>> and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious.
>> What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf
>> specification (presumably from 1.0), and what
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is;
> and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious.
> What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf
> specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed.
Please see Debian policy.
--
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
En/na Joey Hess ha escrit:
mydms package now has been corrected and now depends on debconf |
debconf-2.0.
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
>>Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
>>on debconf by itself without an alternate depe
* lunedì 26 settembre 2005, alle 19:57, Joey Hess scrive:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of th
Hi,
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
It's not entirely clear from the posting, but all that's required
on the mai
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I wonder why you didn't sent it to debian-devel-announce then? This is
> where this really belongs, not? This is what the list is for, not?
It seemed a bit excessive to mail everyone just to get in touch with 286
maintainers. Also I like to encourage the proper use of debi
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
[-SNIP-]
> Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Hi,
> > Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are
> > reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
>
> This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
> beauracracy is fun.
I'm transitioning one of my packages to a potential new-maintainer;
and
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:57:23 +0200, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> aide
This is fixed in experimental (dinstall on 2005-09-27), and will go to
unstable in about a week once the package (which has suffered pretty
big changes) has shown not to contain any
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-26 19:57]:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
>> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
>> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
>> so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 26/set/05, alle ore 19:57, Joey Hess ha scritto:
Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libapache-mod-acct
Fixed yesterday in 0.5-19.
Regards,
- --
Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>flyspray
fixed on yesterday.
I missed your posts on d-devel. maybe a post on d-d-announce would
have been more accurate given the number of concerned packages ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROT
Hello
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on a
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
>
> Debian Apache Maintainers
>apache2
apache2 will be f
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
Yep, debian-devel is not high
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
>
Joey Hess schrieb:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
>>Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
>>on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
>>As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
>>soon, which, omitting all the lg-iss
Hi Joey,
> Paul Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> axyl
> axyl-lucene
Now done, but not yet uploaded due to other changes in the works. I'm
expecting I will get them both uploaded inside two weeks - is that a good
enough timescale for you?
Cheers,
Paul.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages
> remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people
> below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing
> you all. :-P
Absolutely right. ;-) d-d is too busy. Th
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are
>> reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
>
> This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
> beauracracy is fun.
No, it's beca
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are
> reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
beauracracy is fun.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix b
Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to a
Quoting Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of
> this?
Hmmm, apologies (public...just like apologies have to be). This was
intended to be a private reply, but it seems that my fingers are more
used to the "L" key.
--
To UNSUBSCR
Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of
this?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
> "| debconf-2.0"
>dput
Thanks for the reminder.
Fixed in 0.9.2.20.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>geneweb
Fixed in 4.10-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omit
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:27:12 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> clamav-data
> clamav-getfiles
Upload of fixed packages pending current unstable versions migrating
to testing. ETA: Monday.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !!
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omitt
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:27 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omitting all
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:28:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > >spellcast
> >
> > Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends
> Version: 1.0-19
>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>crossfire
1.8.0-1 does not use debconf anymore. Still looking for a sponsor for
the upload.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> >spellcast
>
> Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends
Version: 1.0-19
Depends: debconf, gettext, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.
Joey Hess wrote:
...
>Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cvs
> nas
> seyon
New versions of all three uploaded tonight to fix this...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends debconf \
> |grep-dctrl -FDepends -v '| debconf-2.0' | grep ^Package: \
> | cut -d : -f 2 | dd-list --stdin
Assuming a sid grep-dctrl,
grep-aptavail -FDepends debconf -a -! -FDepends '| debconf-2.0' \
>Achilleas Kotsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ulogd
Fixed localy, will upload soon (due to sponsored upload)
Achilleas Kotsis a.k.a. Achille
-- "whois awk?", sed Grep --
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joey Hess schrieb am 31.08.05, um 22:27 Uhr:
> Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>nvram-wakeup
Fixed package was uploaded a few minutes ago.
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Schmidt, Debian VDR Team
http://pkg-vdr-dvb.alioth.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first
> mail at the beginning of the month.
(...)
> Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>nessus-plugins
Forgot to fix this one, will upload 2.2.5-3 ri
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
bugs.
Also, tha
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 17:08 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I
> finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and
> plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old
> xpilot packages to turn th
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
> debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
> impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
> replace debconf.
>
[...]
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>phpbb2
For the curious: fixed in svn, will be included in next upload.
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Joey Hess wrote:
> Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>fprobe-ng
>fprobe-ulog
>xmail
Since everybody is providing feedback...
I will prepare new packages tommorow and ask my sponsors to upload them.
Radu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess uttered
>xringd
Fixed package in unstable as of a few days ago.
Cheers,
--
Steve
C offers you enough rope to hang yourself.
C++ offers a fully equipped firing squad, a last cigarette and
a blindfold.
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2005-08-02 18:46 -0400]:
> I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
> debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
> impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
> replace debconf.
[...]
because everyone else is doing it...
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cacti
>cacti-cactid
>sugarplum
all three have now been uploaded with proper dependencies.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
Ok, since everybody is reporting back here I will do the same:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>checksecurity
>euro-support
>remem
Done and uploaded.
>samhain
>snort
I will submit new upstream versions of these when time permits
and will fix this
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
> debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
> impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
> replace debconf.
>
> Neil
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:32:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared
> > debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
> > products. I tried to replace the debcon
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared
> debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
> products. I tried to replace the debconf dependency according to your
> suggestion, but the resulting Debian
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Moreover I wonder what the criteria of db_installdebconf are to
> be clever enough to ignore the lines
>
>. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
>db_get "shared/zope/restart" || true
>
> in the postinst file because the package depends from a package
>
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:13 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot?
>
> If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it
> to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion.
I'm still holding out for the remote cha
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Debian Adduser Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> adduser
Fixed version in svn, will be uploaded when the current unstable
versio has migrated to testing.
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> clamav-data
> clamav-getfiles
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >xpilot
>
> I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I
> finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>xpilot
I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I
finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and
plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents
An, 2005 08 02 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess rašė:
> Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ispell-lt
Fixed and the new package is in incoming now.
--
Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper.
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
>> debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
>> been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
>> began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
>> depend
Hi.
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00:46, Joey Hess wrote:
> Juan Manuel Garcia Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> facturalux
Fixed locally, it will be included in next upload.
> moodle-book
I have just uploaded a package with the correction included.
Regards,
Juanma.
--
Juan Manuel Gar
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies
it generates for packages using debhelper.
Hm
* Joey Hess [Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400]:
> Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
>kdebase
>kdenetwork
Fixed in SVN, will be in the next upload.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Old men are fond of giving good advice to console themselves for their
inability
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) writes:
> Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>localepurge
>
The next upload will contain the correction.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cpufreqd
fixed and uploaded.
--
mattia
:wq!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-03 00:46]:
|libphp-adodb
fixed and uploaded.
Regards,
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Sauter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00.46, Joey Hess wrote:
[debconf dance]
> Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> postgrey
tags +pending (fixed in svn)
I hear a new upstream version is in the works, so I'll wait a week or two
before uploading.
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured product: SpamAssassin -
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cdtool
The debconf question will be dropped in next upload. It asks about the
/dev/cdrom symlink that is created elsewhere nowadays.
cheers,
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make
>> the code only to run if there is debconf installed.
>
> Good call. I thought Julien meant removing the "purge old stuff from the
> database", and not just the depend
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]:
> > On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > > I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
> > > only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
> > only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
> You can do that only if those old debconf que
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Since so many packages need to be fixed, I may resort to additional
> private mails (or d-d-a mail) before I begin filing bug reports. The
A mail to d-d-a would probably be a good idea in any case - I can't be
the only person who's neve
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
> only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable
release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid'
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Joey,
> Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>sane-backends
>tilp
I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Develop
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>apt-listchanges
>cricket
>flac
I have no idea how or why flac ended up with a debconf dependency; it
doesn't use it. I've removed it in CVS for my next upload; no bug is
necessary.
--
I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
replace debconf.
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been p
76 matches
Mail list logo
