On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:53:33AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'd be interested in stats of Debian releases, preferred suites, apt
> policies and how many bugs were filed from systems running Debian
> derivatives, or other distros if any.
Alas, this data looks really unreliable. Entries often
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:50:46PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Adam Borowski, on jeu. 23 févr. 2017 13:37:36 +0100, wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:05:31PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > > > I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
> > > > Information" section
Adam Borowski, on jeu. 23 févr. 2017 13:37:36 +0100, wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:05:31PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > > I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
> > > Information" section that reportbug adds.
> >
> > hours during the day
>
> 2016+, X scale: 1
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:05:31PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
> > Information" section that reportbug adds.
>
> hours during the day
2016+, X scale: 1 dot = 12 minutes (5 dots = 2.5 chars = hour)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:16:10PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi, cat staff and useless humies!
>
> I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
> Information" section that reportbug adds.
>
...
> Anything else you'd want me to get? Core counts for >1? UTC hours or days
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Anything else you'd want me to get? Core counts for >1? UTC hours or days
> of week when bugs are filed? Kernels that've been in the archive vs those
> that haven't?
I'd be interested in stats of Debian releases, preferred suites, apt
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 19:16 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
[...]
> +===+
> > ꜰᴏʀᴇɪɢɴ ᴀʀᴄʜꜱ |
>
> +===+
> Lots of noise, thus only tidbits. 2016+:
>
> 57% of amd64 have i386.
>
> Only 148 of i386 have amd64, despite 229 (per above) running an amd64
> kernel. Shouldn't they
Hi, cat staff and useless humies!
I've done some data mining on bug reports that include a "System
Information" section that reportbug adds.
This information is notoriously corrupted and/or includes write-in stuff. I
tried to do my best to recover data when it could be done unambigously; many
8 matches
Mail list logo
