At 10:57 +1100 2000-03-12, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>Also, libc6 tries to restart some NSS-using services, but never seems
>to succeed in restarting sshd. I end up with it refusing connections,
>although sshd still appears to be running (the original process and
>not a new one).
I guess that means th
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 08:10:07PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 08:32:07PM -0400, Nicolás Lichtmaier was heard to say:
> > > > Trouble ahead?
> > > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > > don't manage well the perl transition. This wil
> > > > Trouble ahead?
> > > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > > don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> > > Release Notes.
> >
> > Why don't we make the new perls conflict the old apt?
>
> Augh, no don't do that!
>
> Upg
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, [iso-8859-1] Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > Trouble ahead?
> > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> > Release Notes.
>
> Why don't we make the new perls conflict
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 08:32:07PM -0400, Nicolás Lichtmaier was heard to say:
> > > Trouble ahead?
> > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> > Release Notes.
>
> Why don't we make the ne
And/or make the new Perl pre-depend on the new apt, so the apt update
will happen before anything else?
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > Trouble ahead?
> > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > don't manage well the perl transition. This w
> > Trouble ahead?
> Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
> Release Notes.
Why don't we make the new perls conflict the old apt?
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 04:37:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:06:24PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
> > Trouble ahead?
>
> Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in t
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 04:37:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog was heard to say:
> Le Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:06:24PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
> > Trouble ahead?
>
> Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> don't manage well the perl transition. This will be docu
Le Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:06:24PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
> Trouble ahead?
Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
don't manage well the perl transition. This will be documented in the
Release Notes.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -=- http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/
I just considered upgrading a slink server here to potato. I
apt-get updated and then ran apt-get dist-upgrade.
exim is held back, because libopenldap1 is uninstallable,
because libopenldap-runtime is uninstallable, because debconf
is uninstallable, because perl-5.004* is to be installed
rather t
11 matches
Mail list logo
