On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:56:09PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 07:01:25AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > fixed and the new version of quota should go into woody--better the
> > devil we know that the devil we don't. (And we really don't need another
> > "well, this new v
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:45:40PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> There is a point where backporting is actually more risky than using
> the (presumably tested) new upstream version.
I thinks so too, yes.
> However, what else has changed in quota 2.00? Are there incompatibilities?
I don't kno
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 07:01:25AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> The only RCB left in quota is a *packaging* bug. IMHO, that should get
Correct.
> fixed and the new version of quota should go into woody--better the
> devil we know that the devil we don't. (And we really don't need another
> "well
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:45:40PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:32:48AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > I just checked through the bugs open against quota and found that quite a
> > lot of them are fixed in the new upstream version 2.00-pre4. Yes, it is not
> > final
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:32:48AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I just checked through the bugs open against quota and found that quite a
> lot of them are fixed in the new upstream version 2.00-pre4. Yes, it is not
> final so far but probably will be pretty soon. Now I wonder if it is
> possible
I just checked through the bugs open against quota and found that quite a
lot of them are fixed in the new upstream version 2.00-pre4. Yes, it is not
final so far but probably will be pretty soon. Now I wonder if it is
possible to add this version to frozen. If not all bug fixes have to be
backport
6 matches
Mail list logo
