On 5/11/07, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea. That might make my reports obsolete, and that would be OK
for me.
Integrating it into the newly ressurected dehs might be useful too.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 12:16 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:57 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:49 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 11:21]:
Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:14 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:16 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Bart Martens]
I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental,
but that is not a high priority to me because this does not change
that Debian Unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bart Martens a écrit :
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:14 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:16 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Bart Martens]
I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental,
but that is not a high
On 5/10/07, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should be better now.
http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/outdated.html
Excellent. For even more usefulness points, this could be integrated
into qa.d.o/developer.php - perhaps as extra columns in the watch area
that would be initially hidden
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 08:01 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Should be better now. If you still see false positives, then I'm very
interested.
There is no gaim in unstable any more, but its renamed to pidgin.
Regards,
Amir
PS: Sorry for the PM.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 09:51 +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Hi,
There's at least one false positive left. See picard package.
Regards, Adam.
I verified whether picard [0] would be a false positive on this list
[1]. It has no version in Unstable and it has no version in the
NEW-queue
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:07 +1000, Paul Wise wrote:
On 5/10/07, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should be better now.
http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/outdated.html
Excellent. For even more usefulness points, this could be integrated
into qa.d.o/developer.php - perhaps as
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:47 +0200, Amir Tabatabaei wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 08:01 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Should be better now. If you still see false positives, then I'm very
interested.
There is no gaim in unstable any more, but its renamed to pidgin.
At this moment gaim
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:16 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Bart Martens]
I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental,
but that is not a high priority to me because this does not change
that Debian Unstable is outdated for the listed packages.
Uh ... I thought
[Peter Samuelson]
Uh ... I thought the point of your project was to help package
maintainers. Obviously if the maintainer has put something in
experimental, he has already done the work to package it!
From my point of view, the goal of utnubu project is helping package
maintainers help
[Bart Martens]
I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental,
but that is not a high priority to me because this does not change
that Debian Unstable is outdated for the listed packages.
Uh ... I thought the point of your project was to help package
maintainers.
Hi Package Maintainers (DD's and non-DD's),
Now that Etch is released to stable, many package maintainers have
already updated their packages to the newest upstream releases. That is
of course very good.
However, some packages have no working debian/watch file, and then it is
not always easily
* Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 11:21]:
Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian to
newer upstream releases is by comparing Debian with Ubuntu. Here is a
list of packages that are newer in Ubuntu than in Debian, grouped by
maintainer:
* Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 11:21]:
Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian to
newer upstream releases is by comparing Debian with Ubuntu. Here is a
list of packages that are newer in Ubuntu than in Debian, grouped by
maintainer:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:51:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Matthew, you still have some packages in Debian. Should they be
orphaned, or do you intend to maintain them through sponsors?
For the most part, I'm planning on maintaining them through sponsors.
There's one or two that should
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:49 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 11:21]:
Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian to
newer upstream releases is by comparing Debian with Ubuntu. Here is a
list of packages that are newer in
Hello Bart,
is there some kind of agreement between Debian and Ubuntu concerning the
distribution part of the version?
I ask this because you seem to assume that:
X.Y.Z-K (Debian) X.Y.Z-L (Ubuntu)
X.Y.Z-K (Debian) X.Y.Z-KubuntuA (Ubuntu)
(also dfsg stuff doesn't seem
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:39:27PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hello Bart,
is there some kind of agreement between Debian and Ubuntu concerning the
distribution part of the version?
The scheme is described here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment#UbuntuPackages
which is linked, along
Hello!
On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:02:16 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
I have updated the list to hide packages with identical upstream
version numbers but with different epochs. This might hide some
real positives but most likely hides more false positives.
I suggest to take into account
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bart Martens a écrit :
Hi Package Maintainers (DD's and non-DD's),
Now that Etch is released to stable, many package maintainers have
already updated their packages to the newest upstream releases. That is
of course very good.
However, some
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 21:28 +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bart Martens a écrit :
Hi Package Maintainers (DD's and non-DD's),
Now that Etch is released to stable, many package maintainers have
already updated their packages to the
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:36 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:02:16 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
I have updated the list to hide packages with identical upstream
version numbers but with different epochs. This might hide some
real positives but most likely hides
23 matches
Mail list logo
