Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> Ah, on re-reading my first sentence, I think I should have added "in theory"
> :-) I agree with your point that having hundreds of symlinks from
> binary-i586 to binary-i386 allows us to use the current tools with very
> little changes.
FYI, we may have the same problem
On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 02:10:35PM -0500, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 07, 1997 at 06:20:27PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >
> > > it's the obvious way... create another architecture tree, binary-i586
> > > (gosh, that going to hit h
On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 1997 at 06:20:27PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> > it's the obvious way... create another architecture tree, binary-i586
> > (gosh, that going to hit hard on the mirror eventually. Time to get yet
> > another harddisk for the Deb
On Sun, Dec 07, 1997 at 06:20:27PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
>
> > How about a binary-pent directory with symlinks back to binary-i386 until
> > a package is uploaded. Then we need to tell dselect(ftp) to get the
> > packages from binary-pent
On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
> How about a binary-pent directory with symlinks back to binary-i386 until
> a package is uploaded. Then we need to tell dselect(ftp) to get the
> packages from binary-pent instead of binary-i386.
it's the obvious way... create another architecture tr
On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > How about a binary-pent directory with symlinks back to binary-i386 until
> > a package is uploaded. Then we need to tell dselect(ftp) to get the
> > packages from binary-pent instead of binary-i386. Is there an easy way to
> > do this? (Also,
> How about a binary-pent directory with symlinks back to binary-i386 until
> a package is uploaded. Then we need to tell dselect(ftp) to get the
> packages from binary-pent instead of binary-i386. Is there an easy way to
> do this? (Also, if pentium clones also work with the ecgs compiled
> pac
On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Now that ecgs has ben officially released, maybe it's time to think (again)
> about pentium/pro/K6/... specific packages. I think it would be good to have
> a section i586 which would contain pentium specific packages. I don't know
Now that ecgs has ben officially released, maybe it's time to think (again)
about pentium/pro/K6/... specific packages. I think it would be good to have
a section i586 which would contain pentium specific packages. I don't know
how this conflict with the current dpkg* tools (such as d
9 matches
Mail list logo
