On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 05:44:25 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 08.10.2012 22:53, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > That applies as well to any path generated at maintainer script or
> > run time by the package (like state, cache, log files, etc), but I
> > don't think it's currently a good idea for these t
Hi guillem!
On 08.10.2012 22:53, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:02:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 08.10.2012 20:15, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> I actually find it pretty handy if I can use dpkg -S to find out which
>> package a particular directory belongs to.
>> So shippi
On 10/09/2012 02:53 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
And? It's perfectly possible to share directories between multiple
packages.
The fact that /var/run/mysql/ would be owned by multiple packages is no
different from the fact that /var/run/ is already owned by multiple
packages:
$ dpkg -S /var/run
bas
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Imagine for a minute that we have 2 implementation of the same service.
> Lets say, for this example, MariaDB and MySQL (this is *not* a real world
> example, since last time I checked, we don't have MariaDB in Debian but
> it well could be a real proble
On 10/09/2012 02:15 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The thing is that it really does no harm if a package actually does
this; although it is pretty pointless since those files will be gone
after reboot. So, even though policy says "must not", it's not really
a problem in practice, so important is pr
Hi!
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:02:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 08.10.2012 20:15, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> "Packages must not include files or directories under /run,
> >> or under the older /var/run and /var/lock paths."
> >
> > Th
On 08.10.2012 20:15, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> "Packages must not include files or directories under /run,
>> or under the older /var/run and /var/lock paths."
>
> The thing is that it really does no harm if a package actually does
> this; al
* Michael Gilbert , 2012-10-08, 14:15:
"Packages must not include files or directories under /run, or under
the older /var/run and /var/lock paths."
The thing is that it really does no harm if a package actually does
this
Given that /var/lock is world-writable in Debian, and that dpkg follows
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 01:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Would it be appropriate to file RC bugs against all the packages
>>> shipping anything in /var/run, /var/lock or /run?
>>>
>> No, there's nothing wrong with that.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Julien
>
> Li
On 08/10/2012 12:33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 01:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 23:16:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
>>> packages would be affected. Right now I have about
On 10/08/2012 01:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 23:16:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
packages would be affected. Right now I have about 100 candidate
piuparts logs that should cover /var/run and /var/
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 23:16:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
> packages would be affected. Right now I have about 100 candidate
> piuparts logs that should cover /var/run and /var/lock, but I haven't
> sorted them in "b
On 10/06/2012 03:16 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 10/06/2012 05:46 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Anyone who wants to take this easy job? Since I don't have to analyze
piuparts logs for getting the data ... Andreas
Hi,
I'll try to send bugs *with patches* over this week end.
Thomas Goirand (zigo
On 10/06/2012 05:46 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Anyone who wants to take this easy job? Since I don't have to analyze
piuparts logs for getting the data ... Andreas
Hi,
I'll try to send bugs *with patches* over this week end.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-re
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:35:53PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Beckmann , 2012-10-05, 23:16:
> >I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
> >packages would be affected. Right now I have about 100 candidate
> >piuparts logs that should cover /var/run and /var/lock, bu
On 2012-10-05 23:35, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Lintian should be able to spot all the buggy ones, shouldn't it?
Good point.
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dir-or-file-in-run.html
0 :-)
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dir-or-file-in-var-run.html
28 (6 overridden)
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dir
* Andreas Beckmann , 2012-10-05, 23:16:
I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
packages would be affected. Right now I have about 100 candidate
piuparts logs that should cover /var/run and /var/lock, but I haven't
sorted them in "buggy", "depends on buggy", "other prob
Hi,
I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
packages would be affected. Right now I have about 100 candidate
piuparts logs that should cover /var/run and /var/lock, but I haven't
sorted them in "buggy", "depends on buggy", "other problem". I expect
the buggy category to be
18 matches
Mail list logo
