Re: pre-dependency for fetchmail, fetchmail-ssl

2001-12-24 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Torsten Landschoff wrote: > Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that > I would suggest having two packages depend on each other... :) Cyclic depencies are allowed, you just have to configure the packages in the same run. Wichert. -- _

Re: pre-dependency for fetchmail, fetchmail-ssl

2001-12-24 Thread Nicolas Chauvat
Richard Braakman wrote: On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:51:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: So you can never have two packages that depend on each other? Correct. Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that I would

Re: pre-dependency for fetchmail, fetchmail-ssl

2001-12-23 Thread Richard Braakman
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:51:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > > So you can never have two packages that depend on each other? > > > > Correct. > > Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that > I would

Re: pre-dependency for fetchmail, fetchmail-ssl

2001-12-23 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:51:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > So you can never have two packages that depend on each other? > > Correct. Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that I would suggest having two packages depend on each other... :) cu Torsten pgps