Previously Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that
> I would suggest having two packages depend on each other... :)
Cyclic depencies are allowed, you just have to configure the packages
in the same run.
Wichert.
--
_
Richard Braakman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:51:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
So you can never have two packages that depend on each other?
Correct.
Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that
I would
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:51:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > So you can never have two packages that depend on each other?
> >
> > Correct.
>
> Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that
> I would
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:51:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > So you can never have two packages that depend on each other?
>
> Correct.
Isn't there this loop break hack in dpkg to allow for that? Not that
I would suggest having two packages depend on each other... :)
cu
Torsten
pgps
4 matches
Mail list logo