Hi there!
On Tue, 15 May 2012 01:10:19 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mo, 14 Mai 2012, Clint Adams wrote:
dpkg-source is more intolerant of fuzz than quilt itself.
Run quilt refresh on the patch and it should be happier.
Ar ... is this on purpose? Or by chance? Or to drive
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
* Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at [120515 01:10]:
For these kind of things the expected behaviour is that quilt and
dpkg-source behave the same way, and if not, dpkg-source should
warn or whatever.
I think the patched debian source format should
* Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at [120515 01:10]:
For these kind of things the expected behaviour is that quilt and
dpkg-source behave the same way, and if not, dpkg-source should
warn or whatever.
I think the patched debian source format should not depend on what
quilt does but be sensible
Hi everyone,
can anyone explain the following:
# in a debian pacakge unpacked:
$ quilt push -a
Applying patch 01-desktop.patch
patching file poedit.desktop
Hunk #1 succeeded at 15 with fuzz 2 (offset 12 lines).
Now at patch 01-desktop.patch
$ # ok, that went fine
$ quilt pop -a
Removing patch
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:59:38AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
can anyone explain the following:
# in a debian pacakge unpacked:
$ quilt push -a
Applying patch 01-desktop.patch
patching file poedit.desktop
Hunk #1 succeeded at 15 with fuzz 2 (offset 12 lines).
dpkg-source is more
Hi Clint,
thanks a lot or the answer.
On Mo, 14 Mai 2012, Clint Adams wrote:
dpkg-source is more intolerant of fuzz than quilt itself.
Run quilt refresh on the patch and it should be happier.
Ar ... is this on purpose? Or by chance? Or to drive
developers crazy?
No, an answer it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
