Hi,
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 08:11 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Shouldn't it be some kind of policy to mark a bug as fixed,
> only if the fix is available on the same level as the previous
> broken package?
There's a semi-policy IMHO, you can tag[1] the bugs instead of closing
them, so there's a fi
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I've got a problem with marking broken packages as fixed.
Fixed generally means that the bug has been fixed in an NMU, IE, by
someone not the maintainer; fixed-in-experimental is the tag that
usually means that the bug in question has actually been fixed
Hi folks,
I've got a problem with marking broken packages as fixed.
If there is (lets say) a grave functionality bug for package
"M" in unstable or testing, then a bugfix in experimental
doesn't help me. (I made very bad experiences with experimental,
e.g. broken version numbers, currupted apt sy
3 matches
Mail list logo
