Re: question about iptables and bug #538608

2009-07-29 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > At least in one case, I change the series file on-fly at building time > to create different flavors of the same lib with a different patchset. > I roughly suspect this is not compatible with the 3.0 format, but it > is also difficult to be aut

Re: question about iptables and bug #538608

2009-07-29 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:27:20AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > the "renamed debian/patches to debian/patch to avoid > > 3.0-quilt-by-default bug reports" > > changelog in latest iptables makes me uncomfortable... > > is it something we should

Re: question about iptables and bug #538608

2009-07-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Jérémy Lal wrote: > the "renamed debian/patches to debian/patch to avoid > 3.0-quilt-by-default bug reports" > changelog in latest iptables makes me uncomfortable... > is it something we should all do eventually ? Definitely no. Some maintainers with complex build system

question about iptables and bug #538608

2009-07-28 Thread Jérémy Lal
the "renamed debian/patches to debian/patch to avoid 3.0-quilt-by-default bug reports" changelog in latest iptables makes me uncomfortable... is it something we should all do eventually ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl