I know I'm late to the party, but one big win about qemu build servers
is that they can be instantly cloned, replicated, and shared. We can't
do that with real hardware.
--rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-12-20 19:58 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:32:25PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Could you try those packages on hedges? (You can get developer access
from Wookey if you need it). Hedges has 512MB real and 1.5GB swap. And
unlike leisner, the netwinders,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:40:06PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Wookey a écrit :
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:50:12PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote:
For the faster arches, i.e. the ARM9 machines and above, I'm thinking
that we should stick with real hardware so there's no question that the
binaries will run properly.
Pardon
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Pardon me sir, but can that claim that binaries built on so-called
real hardware will unquestionably run (as opposed to, if I understand
correcly, binaries built on an emulated platform) be backed up by any
facts, examples, experimentation
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
These afternoon I saw on #debian-release:
15:52:11 aj | # unilateral action to run an emulated buildd -- all arm
changes sidelined until
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss if there
is any significant
Wookey a écrit :
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss if there
is
Wookey wrote:
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss if there
Wookey a écrit :
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss if there
is
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:05:21PM +, Wookey wrote:
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
Very impressive piece of
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote:
For the faster arches, i.e. the ARM9 machines and above, I'm thinking
that we should stick with real hardware so there's no question that the
binaries will run properly.
Pardon me sir, but can that claim that binaries built on so-called
real
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
* Packages that failed to build because the build daemon netwinder is
fucked for weeks wrt to /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.6
cpufire-applet_1.2-2
gnome-session_2.14.3-4
The situation is actually worse than what I expected. This build daemon
seems to loose files
Bill:
A very basic reason is that some packages require 1GB of RAM to build
in finite time and there are no arm and m68k buildd with that amount of
RAM.
Could you try those packages on hedges? (You can get developer access
from Wookey if you need it). Hedges has 512MB real and 1.5GB
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:32:25PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Could you try those packages on hedges? (You can get developer access
from Wookey if you need it). Hedges has 512MB real and 1.5GB swap. And
unlike leisner, the netwinders, or nslu2s, it's expandable if needed.
No use, this
Hi Aurelien,
I can give some details about the Mono related packages that failed to
build before but worked for you. I reply inline.
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
* Packages that now build fine:
blam_1.8.3-2 (for 40 days)
blam failed because of a runtime bug
Mirco Bauer a écrit :
Hi Aurelien,
I can give some details about the Mono related packages that failed to
build before but worked for you. I reply inline.
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
* Packages that now build fine:
blam_1.8.3-2 (for 40 days)
Oops, there
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Also those package (and they are plenty others), could be tagged
not-for-us. This would spare some build daemon time, and would ease to
see which packages have really failed to build or not.
[...]
openafs_1.4.2-4
As the OpenAFS co-maintainer,
18 matches
Mail list logo
