Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

[Dropping debian-devel-announce: please don't reply to the -announce maillist] ‪‫أحمد المحمودي‬‎ 于2018年6月11日周一 下午10:48写道：‬ > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Collab-maint > > > > > > If you want to allow other Debian Developers to work on your

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Collab-maint > > > > > > If you want to allow other Debian Developers to work on your packages or > > software, you can create projects within the > > **Debian** group.

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Collab-maint > > > If you want to allow other Debian Developers to work on your packages or > software, you can create projects within the > **Debian** group. Every Debian Developer has write access to projects

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hello, On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > For example, have a look at the following packages: > - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/siridb-server > - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcleri > > The maintainer box is not even shown. I guess this might be a bug to file > against

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hello, On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:01:15PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I agree. I have plans to create email addresses like > > team+@tracker.debian.org that could be used for this purpose. > > The package tracker would automatically add those

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I agree. I have plans to create email addresses like > team+@tracker.debian.org that could be used for this purpose. > The package tracker would automatically add those packages to the > respective team. > > We could

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:01:15PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:38:11AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > > > > Question here is: how does the

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, 28 Dec 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:38:11AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > > > Question here is: how does the tracker identify which packages are team > > > maintained? Currently, this

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hello, On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Boyuan Yang wrote: > 在 2017年12月26日星期二 CST 下午9:48:50，Mattia Rizzolo 写道： > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > > The time before the last time I asked about tracker, the answer was > > > that this was not yet possible due to old lintian

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 18:54:22 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >That said while it is possible to use @packages.debian.org email >addresses in Maintainer fields it hat not been "validated" yet and you >will likely see multiple problems. Some of them have been identified >already

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, 28 Dec 2017, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:48:50 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo > wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > >> The time before the last time I asked about tracker, the answer was > >> that this was not yet possible due

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Alexander Wirt: " Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going > into beta" (Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:04:59 +0100): > > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 a

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hi On 31-12-17 06:56, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 12/30/2017 11:34 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >>> Besides: Is it possible to send mail to >>> 'desktop-themes-t...@tracker.debian.org'? Where does it get forwarded? >> >> No. Email sent to that address won't go to anybody. > > Can't we allow people to

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 12/30/2017 11:34 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> Besides: Is it possible to send mail to >> 'desktop-themes-t...@tracker.debian.org'? Where does it get forwarded? > > No. Email sent to that address won't go to anybody. Can't we allow people to subscribe to teams just like subscribing to individual

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

* Alexander Wirt: " Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta" (Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:04:59 +0100): > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:51:45PM +0100

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote: > That's great indeed. Funny enough, tobi, me and some others discussed > this very topic at the 34c3 Debian meeting and came up with the idea to > add groups functionality to tracker.debian.org. It's awesome to learn >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Am 27.12.2017 um 20:49 schrieb Jeremy Bicha: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: >> How can one easily retrieve a list of packages from a specific team, > > The team can make a Tracker team and add their packages individually > to the team like this: >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > First draft is on https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter > > That seems to generate a list of 'RewriteRule's directives. May I > recommend to instead use a RewriteMap? See >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 30, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Anyway, looking forward to your map thing :-) > > First draft is on https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter > Can you first apply some regexp-based mappings, like collab-maint to >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Dec 30, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Anyway, looking forward to your map thing :-) > First draft is on https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter Can you first apply some regexp-based mappings, like collab-maint to Debian? This would automatically solve most cases. --

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > First draft is on https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter That seems to generate a list of 'RewriteRule's directives. May I recommend to instead use a RewriteMap? See https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/rewrite/rewritemap.html

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:51:45PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > Or

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:51:45PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > Or more precisely it was a design flaw from the beginning

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Or more precisely it was a design flaw from the beginning which was > > > intended to be cured with the workaround of annonscm and now

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Or more precisely it was a design flaw from the beginning which was > > intended to be cured with the workaround of annonscm and now it seems > > even this will be broken for no good

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Philipp Kern wrote: >> > Put a mapping into a git repository that DDs can push to? Make sure that >> > it is fast-forwarded always? Then let people deal with it? >> I

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Philipp Kern wrote: > > Put a mapping into a git repository that DDs can push to? Make sure that > > it is fast-forwarded always? Then let people deal with it? > I am currently working on such a mapping. I

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Put a mapping into a git repository that DDs can push to? Make sure that > > it is fast-forwarded always? Then let people deal with it? > I am currently working on such a mapping. Thanks a lot Andreas. --

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:32 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > You are right. It is just not easy to solve this, because this > information must be available on Debian systems. So it would be > something in parallel to downloaded Packages files, right? And > who generates this file(?) based on

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > > Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed > > > and > > > not yet migrated repos. > > Ignore the renamed

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and > > not yet migrated repos. > Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed them then they > obviously

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 12/29/2017 12:51 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and > >> not yet migrated repos. > > Ignore the renamed repositories: if

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:32 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2017-12-29 12:42, Paul Wise wrote: > > This is just a symptom of a Debian design flaw that dates back to > > before we started using VCSen for packaging. We include information in > > the source package that can change independently

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:11:29PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/28/2017 02:33 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > > wrote: > >> If the idea is *not* to move those to @lists.d.o, I cannot see what we > >>

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > This is just a symptom of a Debian design flaw that dates back to > > > before we started using VCSen for packaging. We include information in > > > the source package that can

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 12/28/2017 02:33 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > wrote: >> If the idea is *not* to move those to @lists.d.o, I cannot see what we >> should be using instead. >> >> Any recommendation? > > Someone on your

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 12/29/2017 12:51 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and >> not yet migrated repos. > Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed them then they > obviously

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and > not yet migrated repos. Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed them then they obviously expected to have to update the VCS URLs anyway. Switch the

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 2017-12-29 12:42, Paul Wise wrote: > This is just a symptom of a Debian design flaw that dates back to > before we started using VCSen for packaging. We include information in > the source package that can change independently of the source package > (such as Vcs-*, Homepage, debian/watch,

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:42:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's > > > git repos. And that's one of the

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hi Paul, On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:42:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's > > git repos. And that's one of the reasons I moved all my packaging to > > my own server some

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hello, On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Sean Whitton wrote: > I think what would be ideal is having it disabled by default. People > can turn it on again for their non-packaging repos. > > Upstream's bug tracker suggests GitLab can do this[1] so I've filed a > request.[2] ... which has now been fulfilled.

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:42:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's > > git repos. And that's one of the reasons I moved all my packaging to > > my own server some time ago.

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's > git repos. And that's one of the reasons I moved all my packaging to > my own server some time ago. This is just a symptom of a Debian design flaw that dates back to

Serving repos from salsa, via ‘anonscm.debian.org’ URLs (was: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta)

Guillem Jover writes: > But this still leaves all checkouts that will also need to be updated, > which is way way worse than the changes required in debian/control, > documentation, wiki, etc. :( I also mentioned this when we moved from > git.d.o to anonscm.d.o. This is an

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Mon, 2017-12-25 at 21:10:37 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 25, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Every user can create projects in their own namespace (similar to GitHub). > What about git repository URLs? > I am not looking forward to update all Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 01:35:50 +0100, Philip Rinn wrote: > > Collab-maint > > > > > > If you want to allow other Debian Developers to work on your packages or > > software, you can create projects within the > > **Debian** group. Every Debian Developer has write access to projects

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 14899 March 1977, Philip Rinn wrote: > Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within > teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I was not able to > create a project within the Debian Science Team] Those rights depend on the access level you have

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Adam Borowski writes: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:38:11AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: >> > Question here is: how does the tracker identify which packages are team >> > maintained? Currently, this is

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:38:11AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > > Question here is: how does the tracker identify which packages are team > > maintained? Currently, this is done with the maintainers mail address > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Question here is: how does the tracker identify which packages are team > maintained? Currently, this is done with the maintainers mail address > (which is f.e. debian-science-maintainers@alioth.d.o). However, when > this

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 27.12.2017 12:02:49, Philip Rinn wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > So yes, you need to get a DD to do the one-off work of creating a > > "collab-maint" project and grant you "master" powers in that projects > > (so that you can add future members yourself). Now, is that really so > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > 2017-12-28 2:33 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Bicha : >> Someone on your team should create a Tracker Team. Add the packages >> your team maintains. >> >> https://tracker.debian.org/teams/ >> >> Then anyone can simply

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Jeremy Bicha writes: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > wrote: >> If the idea is *not* to move those to @lists.d.o, I cannot see what we >> should be using instead. >> >> Any recommendation? > > Someone on your team

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 14:12:30 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >Alioth >supports issues as well, but I'm not sure if any team ever used them, and >I would be worried things would just disappear there, never to be seen by >a human. Alioth tickets were used by some teams, which got me

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 22:52:54 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: >On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:51:12PM +, Sean Whitton wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> >> > If a team stops using the BTS for bugs and just uses Salsa's Issues >> > tracker, you can just go to a

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:48:50 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> The time before the last time I asked about tracker, the answer was >> that this was not yet possible due to old lintian doing automated >> rejects on

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

2017-12-28 2:33 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Bicha : > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > wrote: >> If the idea is *not* to move those to @lists.d.o, I cannot see what we >> should be using instead. >> >> Any recommendation? > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 05:57:10AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > > > Then anyone can simply join that tracker team to easily get > > notifications about bugs, commits, uploads, etc. Visit > > https://tracker.debian.org/accounts/subscriptions/ and customize the > > keywords to get the

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:33:39 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Someone on your team should create a Tracker Team. Add the packages > your team maintains. > > https://tracker.debian.org/teams/ > > Then anyone can simply join that tracker team to easily get > notifications about bugs, commits,

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > If the idea is *not* to move those to @lists.d.o, I cannot see what we > should be using instead. > > Any recommendation? Someone on your team should create a Tracker Team. Add the packages your

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hi, 2017-12-27 21:27 Ole Streicher: Andreas Tille writes: I think it became clear what we do not want @lists.debian.org. However, what we want is a common maintainer list for team maintenance. I don't really see this need. This probably depends on the workflow, therefore

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > I haven't confirmed its available on salsa.d.o, and its unfortunately only > one project at a time, but GitLab has an export under Project > Settings→General. github-backup is client side and works at any point in time without needing

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Adam Borowski writes: > And it sounds bad enough that perhaps it'd be good to disable gitlab > issues tracker on Salsa? Otherwise people would file bugs there and > expect them to be handled instead of being more or less rudely > redirected to the BTS. The confusion

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hello, On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: > And it sounds bad enough that perhaps it'd be good to disable gitlab > issues tracker on Salsa? Otherwise people would file bugs there and > expect them to be handled instead of being more or less rudely > redirected to the BTS. I think what

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:51:12PM +, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > > If a team stops using the BTS for bugs and just uses Salsa's Issues > > tracker, you can just go to a page like this (for the Salsa Team) > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hello, On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > If a team stops using the BTS for bugs and just uses Salsa's Issues > tracker, you can just go to a page like this (for the Salsa Team) > https://salsa.debian.org/groups/salsa/-/issues Surely that's impossible because tools like britney need to

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Andreas Tille writes: > I think it became clear what we do not want @lists.debian.org. However, > what we want is a common maintainer list for team maintenance. I don't really see this need. This probably depends on the workflow, therefore could you explain why this is needed?

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > How can one easily retrieve a list of packages from a specific team, The team can make a Tracker team and add their packages individually to the team like this: https://tracker.debian.org/teams/desktop-themes-team/ (This

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:48:50PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > The time before the last time I asked about tracker, the answer was > > that this was not yet possible due to old lintian doing automated > > rejects on ftpmaster. > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 12/27/2017 05:06 AM, Paul Wise wrote: Does anyone know if there is a tool similar to github-backup that supports gitlab? I haven't confirmed its available on salsa.d.o, and its unfortunately only one project at a time, but GitLab has an export under Project Settings→General.

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hi, On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 03:01:47PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Unfortunately that is something that has to be done. At least unless > > > someone > > > wants to write some kind of redirection map. > > I am really surprised that this issue was not considered: I expect that > > git

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 02:49:18PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > I fully agree here. It makes pages like > > > > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=debian-astro-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > quite nonfunctional. And they are even not simple to restore with the > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hi Alexander, On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 06:17:47PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > GNOME Team's current pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth and the Games > > Team's pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth)? > > > > A few packages and pseudo-packages already have lists.d.o mailing lists > > as their

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 06:42:42PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > 2017-12-26 18:15 GMT+01:00 Alexander Wirt : > > Hi, > > > > The infrastructure and tools are not good in maintaining such a huge > > > number >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Le 26/12/2017 à 21:34, Ole Streicher a écrit : I agree with your reasoning. I just wanted to highlight that the situation is in fact worse with the "Team foo " schema: Our tools do not seem ready for that yet. I fully agree here. It makes pages like

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > So yes, you need to get a DD to do the one-off work of creating a > "collab-maint" project and grant you "master" powers in that projects > (so that you can add future members yourself). Now, is that really so > burdersome? Well, probably not. Could you (or anyone else)

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 27.12.2017 08:33:12, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2017-12-27 1:35 GMT+01:00 Philip Rinn : > > > Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within > > teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I was not able > > to > > create a project

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Mattia Rizzolo writes: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:02:06AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Mattia Rizzolo writes: >> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:35:50AM +0100, Philip Rinn wrote: >> >> Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects >> >>

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > we have worked on our git.debian.org replacement based on GitLab. Does anyone know if there is a tool similar to github-backup that supports gitlab? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:02:06AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo writes: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:35:50AM +0100, Philip Rinn wrote: > >> Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects > >> within teams/groups they are member of? Or am I

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Mattia Rizzolo writes: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:35:50AM +0100, Philip Rinn wrote: >> Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects >> within teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I >> was not able to create a project within the

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta, roles

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:48:29AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:33:12AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > 2017-12-27 1:35 GMT+01:00 Philip Rinn : > > > > > Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within > > > teams/groups

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

على الأربعاء 27 كانون الأول 2017 ‫02:46، كتب Mattia Rizzolo: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:35:50AM +0100, Philip Rinn wrote: >> Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within >> teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I was not able >> to >> create

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta, roles

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:33:12AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2017-12-27 1:35 GMT+01:00 Philip Rinn : > > > Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within > > teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I was not able > > to > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:35:50AM +0100, Philip Rinn wrote: > Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within > teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I was not able to > create a project within the Debian Science Team] As Anton noted, you need to

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

2017-12-27 1:35 GMT+01:00 Philip Rinn : > Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within > teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I was not able to > create a project within the Debian Science Team] Hmm, it is really so that

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Hi, thanks for your work, salsa is really great! Is it true (and intended) that -guest users can't create projects within teams/groups they are member of? Or am I missing something? [I was not able to create a project within the Debian Science Team] > Collab-maint > > > If you

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Mehdi Dogguy writes: > On 26/12/2017 15:05, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Mattia Rizzolo writes: >>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: The time before the last time I asked about tracker, the answer was that this was not yet

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On 26/12/2017 15:05, Ole Streicher wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo writes: >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >>> The time before the last time I asked about tracker, the answer was >>> that this was not yet possible due to old lintian doing automated >>>

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 06:42:42PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2017-12-26 18:15 GMT+01:00 Alexander Wirt : Hi, > > The infrastructure and tools are not good in maintaining such a huge number > > of lists. > > That is OK, but can we then have @lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

2017-12-26 18:15 GMT+01:00 Alexander Wirt : >> On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 16:02 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> > We don't want maintainter lists on l.d.o >> >> Why not? > The infrastructure and tools are not good in maintaining such a huge number > of lists. That is OK, but can

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 16:02:08 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > I think we should request the list something like > > > debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org > > > and use it instead of

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 16:02 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > > 2017-12-26 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ole Streicher : > > > > Maintainer: Debian Science Team > > >

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 16:02 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > 2017-12-26 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ole Streicher : > > > Maintainer: Debian Science Team > > > > I think we should request the list something like

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 16:02:08 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > > I think we should request the list something like > > debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org > > and use it instead of @lists.alioth.debian.org > > We don't want maintainter lists on

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2017-12-26 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ole Streicher : > > Maintainer: Debian Science Team > > I think we should request the list something like > debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org > and use it instead of

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

2017-12-26 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ole Streicher : > Maintainer: Debian Science Team I think we should request the list something like debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org and use it instead of @lists.alioth.debian.org Cheers Anton

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

Mattia Rizzolo writes: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> The time before the last time I asked about tracker, the answer was >> that this was not yet possible due to old lintian doing automated >> rejects on ftpmaster. > > That's now fixed, and

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 26, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Unfortunately that is something that has to be done. At least unless someone > > wants to write some kind of redirection map. > I am really surprised that this issue was not considered: I

  1   2   >