Re: separate package for iotop?

2008-04-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20-Apr-08, 16:33 (CDT), Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another package it should be added to.

Re: separate package for iotop?

2008-04-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Paul, thanks for bringing iotop to my attention! On Monday 21 April 2008 13:13, Paul Wise wrote: Craig, do you think including the iotop python script in procps is a good idea or should I create a separate package for it. moreutils might also be an option, it would also be a new

Re: separate package for iotop?

2008-04-20 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another package it should be added to. Any thoughts? Perhaps along with top in procps? The python dependency should not be introduced - so if we dont have a python based system management

Re: separate package for iotop?

2008-04-20 Thread Steve Greenland
On 20-Apr-08, 16:33 (CDT), Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another package it should be added to. Any thoughts? Perhaps along with top in procps? The python dependency