Re: package names for library modules (was: shlibs vs symbols)

2008-02-05 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 09:37 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote: > > I was reviewing a library package RFS (libthai) and I noticed that the > > shlibs pointed at version X and all the symbols in the symbols file > > pointed at an earlier version. Here I ass

Re: shlibs vs symbols?

2008-02-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote: > I was reviewing a library package RFS (libthai) and I noticed that the > shlibs pointed at version X and all the symbols in the symbols file > pointed at an earlier version. Here I assume that the shlibs should be > changed to point to the earlier versio

shlibs vs symbols?

2008-02-05 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, I was reviewing a library package RFS (libthai) and I noticed that the shlibs pointed at version X and all the symbols in the symbols file pointed at an earlier version. Here I assume that the shlibs should be changed to point to the earlier version? Then I had a look at the 26 (out of ~5