Re: solution for lids-packages

2001-04-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:11:56PM +0200, David Spreen wrote: > Hi there, > > Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement > > is > Btw. this was really 'dam' approvement, not damn approvement :) > > There's no reason for me to curse, and I didn't want to, so let's

Re: solution for lids-packages

2001-04-24 Thread David Spreen
Hi there, > Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement > is Btw. this was really 'dam' approvement, not damn approvement :) There's no reason for me to curse, and I didn't want to, so let's forget it. so long... David -- __ _ | David "n

Re: solution for lids-packages

2001-04-24 Thread David Spreen
Hi there, On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:31:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:06:27AM +0200, David Spreen wrote: > > Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement > > is > > not finished yet, > > There's no reason to curse about it. Would

Re: solution for lids-packages

2001-04-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:06:27AM +0200, David Spreen wrote: > Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement > is > not finished yet, There's no reason to curse about it. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux| Never attribute t

solution for lids-packages

2001-04-23 Thread David Spreen
Hi there, ok I will limit the lids packages to i386 to get them in woody. After the freeze I will make different packages for unstable with arch: any. Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement is not finished yet, it's not easy to become access to the porters mach