Re: static user IDs

1999-09-22 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 09:40:03PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Who will agree with me that > > qmail[dsrqlp] should be forbidden > > Their existance in /etc/passsd rape me thru my eyes > > 6 statics for pacage is a bad idea but > > if this package isnt even free they should be > > thown out

Re: static user IDs

1999-09-22 Thread Philip Hands
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [1 ] > On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > > Who will agree with me that > > qmail[dsrqlp] should be forbidden > > Their existance in /etc/passsd rape me thru my eyes > > 6 statics for pacage is a bad idea but > > i

Re: static user IDs

1999-09-22 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > Who will agree with me that > qmail[dsrqlp] should be forbidden > Their existance in /etc/passsd rape me thru my eyes > 6 statics for pacage is a bad idea but > if this package isnt even free they should be > thown out without m

Re: static user IDs

1999-09-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > Who will agree with me that > qmail[dsrqlp] should be forbidden > Their existance in /etc/passsd rape me thru my eyes > 6 statics for pacage is a bad idea but > if this package isnt even free they should be > thown out without

Re: static user IDs

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Who will agree with me that qmail[dsrqlp] should be forbidden Their existance in /etc/passsd rape me thru my eyes 6 statics for pacage is a bad idea but if this package isnt even free they should be thown out without mercy