Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Since you seem to be in this kind of statistics, you may want to try to
> find out which developers are the most productive (ie: have done the
> highest number of uploads) ;)
Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package
uploads, not binary pac
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 03:44:25PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source
> package uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the
> hit count for people maintining multiple binary packages.
Well, often times, those packages are more
David Welton wrote:
> Well, often times, those packages are more complex than single binary
> packages. No way is epic as difficult to maintain as X, yet, if I'm
> not mistaken, they each have just one source package.
>
> It would be neat to do both stats, and then compare.
I actually did the o
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> I actually did the other way first, it wasn't siginificantly different
> except Brandon Robinson was in 3rd place (X).
Spell m' damn name right, boy!!!
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | If enc
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package
> uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the hit count for
> people maintining multiple binary packages.
Well, I might have made it on the list if you weighted by compi
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 01:50:53PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, you asked for it, you got it. Note this is a count of source package
> > uploads, not binary packages which would have inflated the hit count for
> > people maintining multiple binary pa
6 matches
Mail list logo
