On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:00:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
So far so good, but why is it allowed for a kernel header to include a
file that does not exist?
mips is not managed i
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:55:12AM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > $ dpkg -c
> > l/linux-kernel-headers/linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2_mips.deb |grep
> > cpu-feature
> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 4858 2005-07-12 21:46:46
> > ./usr/include/asm/cpu-features.h
> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 41
* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-23 19:13]:
> > So far so good, but why is it allowed for a kernel header to
> > include a file that does not exist?
> mips is not managed in the tree of linus. So it is likely that it
> regulary breaks.
Actually, there has been lots of syncing going on
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:00:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > So far so good, but why is it allowed for a kernel header to include a file
> > that does not exist?
>
> mips is not managed in the tree of linus. So it is likely that it
>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:00:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> So far so good, but why is it allowed for a kernel header to include a file
> that does not exist?
mips is not managed in the tree of linus. So it is likely that it
regulary breaks.
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a di
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:55:12AM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > It is probably (also?) a sysklogd bug, userland code isn't supposed to
> > use the kernel's atomic operations.
>
> It is only a sysklogd bug. Userland code is not allowed to use kernel
>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:55:12AM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> It is probably (also?) a sysklogd bug, userland code isn't supposed to
> use the kernel's atomic operations.
It is only a sysklogd bug. Userland code is not allowed to use kernel
headers directly.
Bastian
--
We do not colonize. W
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:47:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:22:27AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> > > for the entire lifetime of the current stable release. Will -17.1 be
> > > making its way into stable
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:22:27AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> > for the entire lifetime of the current stable release. Will -17.1 be
> > making its way into stable any time soon?
> I seriously doubt so. Changing the stable sysklogd re
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> for the entire lifetime of the current stable release. Will -17.1 be
> making its way into stable any time soon?
I seriously doubt so. Changing the stable sysklogd requires an upload to
stable (which did not happen), and that the stable release manage
10 matches
Mail list logo
