On 8/21/21, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 05:29:54PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>> I have a new-be question, what is the point of merged-usr?
>
> I put "debian merged-usr" into my favourite search engine and the
> first result was:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org
Hi Tim,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 05:29:54PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> I have a new-be question, what is the point of merged-usr?
I put "debian merged-usr" into my favourite search engine and the
first result was:
https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge
Does this page and those linked fr
All,
Sorry I am a little late to this party so I have a new-be question,
what is the point of merged-usr? It seems like a lot of work for a
little reward, as the packages already work. Is there a legitimate
benefit for changing all these file paths that I am missing?
Thanks
Tim
On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 07:26:51 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The options you present to work around this sound plausible to me, but
> they do complicate the transition plan somewhat. In essence, we'll get
> two transition points. One for non-buildds and another for them.
Maybe that, but what I wa
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:49:22AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I agree that's a potential failure mode, although the window for regression
> is not necessarily very long (foo would have to regress after the automatic
> transition is already in place).
Yes. You phrased it better, then
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 10:06:27 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:19:06PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > If we want to make buildd chroots merged-/usr any time soon, then I
> > think we need to say this class of bugs is RC for bookworm.
>
> For a moment, let us assume perf
6 matches
Mail list logo
