Z
Sent from my iPhone
Le Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:05:38PM +, Neil Williams a écrit :
Just because a filename is reused doesn't mean that the packages
put the same code into that filename.
Le Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:41:51PM +, Stephen Gran a écrit :
Whether or not these are actually the same files, I
Dear all,
while reviewing an Ubuntu package that we are considering to submit to the NEW
queue for inclusion in Debian, I found a copy of source files from the
‘minizip’ package, that was not mentionned in debian/copyright.
Suspecting that it could have been overlooked by many others, I had a
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:50:43 +0900
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
Suspecting that it could have been overlooked by many others, I had a look at
source.debian.net and checked a couple of packages randomly.
http://source.debian.net/source/search?path=unzip.c
This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said:
The conclusion is that we should either change our policy on copyright
documentation (that goes further than what is required by some licenses),
or double-check our packages.
Whether or not these are actually the same files, I would have
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:50:43 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear all,
while reviewing an Ubuntu package that we are considering to submit to the NEW
queue for inclusion in Debian, I found a copy of source files from the
‘minizip’ package, that was not mentionned in debian/copyright.
[...]
The
Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear all,
while reviewing an Ubuntu package that we are considering to submit to the
NEW queue for inclusion in Debian, I found a copy of source files from the
‘minizip’ package, that was not mentionned in debian/copyright.
Suspecting that it could have been
7 matches
Mail list logo
