On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:37:17 +, Ben Hutchings
wrote:
>That's why I was suggesting a replacement package that would provide
>similar functionality but using 'ip' so not subject to the limitations
>of the vlan ioctl interface.
Do we already have such a replacement package?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Hello.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:47:31AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> The real problem is that vconfig (or rather the kernel interface it
> used) imposed any scheme at all. Requiring a '.' is equally short-
> sighted. Let me give an example:
IMHO not equally, but yes... too shortsighted.
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 22:32 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprec
On Jan 06, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> (PS. Now if we could only replace net-tools with a similar wrapper
> script and finally deprecate the ioctl based tools there as well. ;P)
We should hunt down and fix the few packages still depending on
net-tools (hello bind9!).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature
Hello again.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated
> > vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded
>
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated
> vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded
> a new version of the package to experimental. See vlan 2.0 also
> available from https:
Hello.
Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated
vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded
a new version of the package to experimental. See vlan 2.0 also
available from https://people.debian.org/~ah/vlan-2.0/ for the
impatient who doesn't want to w
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 14:28 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:07:40AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote:
> > > I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint
> > > /vlan.git/
> > > debian/network/if-pre-up.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:07:40AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote:
I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vlan.git/
debian/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan, if-post-up.d/vlan …
and not support en* or br* which are quite common
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote:
> I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vlan.git/
>
> debian/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan, if-post-up.d/vlan …
>
> and not support en* or br* which are quite common nowadays.
>
> need to file a bug or just customize an
I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vlan.git/
debian/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan, if-post-up.d/vlan …
and not support en* or br* which are quite common nowadays.
need to file a bug or just customize and use it myself?
Thanks.
11 matches
Mail list logo