Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-07 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:37:17 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >That's why I was suggesting a replacement package that would provide >similar functionality but using 'ip' so not subject to the limitations >of the vlan ioctl interface. Do we already have such a replacement package? Greetings Marc -- -

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-07 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello. On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:47:31AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > The real problem is that vconfig (or rather the kernel interface it > used) imposed any scheme at all.  Requiring a '.' is equally short- > sighted. Let me give an example: IMHO not equally, but yes... too shortsighted.

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 22:32 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello again. > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprec

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-06 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 06, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > (PS. Now if we could only replace net-tools with a similar wrapper > script and finally deprecate the ioctl based tools there as well. ;P) We should hunt down and fix the few packages still depending on net-tools (hello bind9!). -- ciao, Marco signature

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-06 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello again. On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated > > vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded >

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello. > > Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated > vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded > a new version of the package to experimental. See vlan 2.0 also > available from https:

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-06 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello. Since this isn't the first time the vlan package with its deprecated vconfig command causes discussions I've gone ahead and uploaded a new version of the package to experimental. See vlan 2.0 also available from https://people.debian.org/~ah/vlan-2.0/ for the impatient who doesn't want to w

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 14:28 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:07:40AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote: > > > I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint > > > /vlan.git/ > > > debian/network/if-pre-up.

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-06 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:07:40AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote: I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vlan.git/ debian/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan, if-post-up.d/vlan … and not support en* or br* which are quite common

Re: vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:46 +0900, Seyeong Kim wrote: > I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vlan.git/ > > debian/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan, if-post-up.d/vlan … > > and not support en* or br* which are quite common nowadays. > > need to file a bug or just customize an

vlan support en* or br*?

2016-01-05 Thread Seyeong Kim
I checked vlan source http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vlan.git/ debian/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan, if-post-up.d/vlan … and not support en* or br* which are quite common nowadays. need to file a bug or just customize and use it myself? Thanks.