Re: what about PTS (Re: libunwind and ia64)

2014-01-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 16:19:24 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > And regarding the icu52 transition: The transition tracker is not smart > enough to detect that a package has finished the transition (i.e. > testing has a version satisfying the "good" constraint.). But this does > not happen too o

Re: what about PTS (Re: libunwind and ia64)

2014-01-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2014-01-27 15:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2014-01-27 14:12, Osamu Aoki wrote: It seems that this "auto-*" transition should not block upload if old libunwind7 library is used. Especially for packages indirectly depending on one of the auto-* packages. That is good. Looks like the trans

Re: what about PTS (Re: libunwind and ia64)

2014-01-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-01-27 14:12, Osamu Aoki wrote: > It seems that this "auto-*" transition should not block upload if old > libunwind7 library is used. Especially for packages indirectly > depending on one of the auto-* packages. That is good. Looks like the transition tracker should get an optional flag "

what about PTS (Re: libunwind and ia64)

2014-01-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, It seems I got good answers then I have another practical question : Can I upload ibus-qt package with warnings on PTS as below. On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:06:07 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > libunwind seems to be holding o