ALERT!This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner scans
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 212796
Bug#212796: dpkg-checkbuilddeps fails with arch-restricted build-deps
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
reopen 212796
thanks
Now dpkg-checkbuilddeps requires arch dependent build-deps on all archs,
not just the specified arch:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), cdbs (>= 0.4.5.3), autotools-dev, libttf-dev
(>=1.4pre.20030402-1), libglib1.2-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, liborbit-dev,
libncurses5-dev, xlibs-dev
Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> Adam Heath wrote:
>> > I'm not fixing this bug. automake should not be doing what it is
>> > doing, as it was bound to fail. automake was depending on questionable,
>> > and wrong behaviour, and it's not surprising it died as it has
* Adam Heath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031026 19:55]:
> For instance, if we delay this 'fix' until after sarge is release, we will
> *still* have the problem then. There will be backed in sarge that *will not
> build* when sarge+1 is released.
No. If you change this as soon as sarge is out, it's very
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 217605 xdm
Bug#217605: dselect: cannot configure xdm, it works with other pkgs though. it
says: "basename: toomany arguments"
Bug reassigned from package `dselect' to `xdm'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 213524
Bug#213524: dpkg: new install-info creates serious breakage, see #213524
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
Stopp
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> I see there was a dpkg upload today, but it didn't fix this. Please, is
> there any chance that this patch could be applied before sarge? dselect
> makes bad mistakes due to this bug, and it will result in much confusion
> if it makes it into a stable rel
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > I'm not fixing this bug. automake should not be doing what it is
> > doing, as it was bound to fail. automake was depending on questionable,
> > and wrong behaviour, and it's not surprising it died as it has.
>
> Yes, we all agree
reassign 217605 xdm
thanks
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Aldo Maggi wrote:
> Configuro xdm (4.2.1-12.1) ...
> basename: troppi argomenti
> Usare `basename --help' per ulteriori informazioni.
> dpkg: errore processando xdm (--configure):
> il sottoprocesso post-installation script ha restituito un codic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 151662 + pending
Bug#151662: dselect: changes selections without notice
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
> * Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-25 12:50]:
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > tag 217415 moreinfo
> > severity 217415 important
> > thanks
> >
> > Can you repeat this? I need more info.
I do try to install Debian on my new powerbookG4 but I can't. The only
thing I could do was to boot w
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:50:28PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 12:16:18AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I think the following patch is the right fix. I'm cc'ing Joey on this
> > because I'd like him to confirm that it makes sense with the original
> > intent of his change.
Hi.
Frankly, I believe the whole build-arch idea is flawed.
The introduction of a new package format five years ago was a huge
improvement over the previous format. The proposals I've seen to
"improve" the current source format add a lot of complexities for
very little gain.
What do you guys think of this idea? I think it's one of the smartest
I've heard for a while, and leaves open the possibility of further
extensions.
Another possibility is to have something like debian/rules.features,
which would have a list of features supported by the debian/rules
file. For ex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 213524
Bug#213524: dpkg: new install-info creates serious breakage, see #213524
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
reopen 213524
thanks
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
>> In the most recent dpkg package, "install-info --version" now shows its
>> output on stdout, not stderr.
>> As a result, this code in /usr/share/automake-1.7/am/texinfos.am
>> does not wor
Adam Heath wrote:
> I'm not fixing this bug. automake should not be doing what it is
> doing, as it was bound to fail. automake was depending on questionable,
> and wrong behaviour, and it's not surprising it died as it has.
Yes, we all agree on that, but the issue here is not to blame dpkg or
a
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid
Why don't add to dpkg a way to schedule command executions, evoiding to run
a command everytime a package is configured. ldconfig runs everytime a library
is configured, I have a slow laptop and I think it could be useful to schedule
ldco
Package: dselect
Version: 1.10.10
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux paperino 2.6.0-test8 #1 Thu Oct 23 22:13:51 CEST 2003 i586
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL
PROTECTED])
Version
20 matches
Mail list logo
