Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Meanwhile, I am using this: unversioned depends and two conflicts: (
{Upstream-Version}), (= {Upstream-Version}.1).
Depends: foo (={Upstream-Version}), foo ( {Upstream-Version}.1)
instead should also work without the need for a
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Meanwhile, I am using this: unversioned depends and two conflicts: (
{Upstream-Version}), (= {Upstream-Version}.1).
Depends: foo (={Upstream-Version}), foo ( {Upstream-Version}.1)
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:42:41 -0200]:
Yes. It is just a matter of which one you like better. You could also have
one depends and one conflicts instead of two conflicts or two depends.
Versioned conflicts are said to increase apt's trouble to upgrade from
one
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Meanwhile, I am using this: unversioned depends and two conflicts: (
{Upstream-Version}), (= {Upstream-Version}.1).
Depends: foo
Hi,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh schrieb:
We really need another substvar with different semantics.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/09/msg01251.html
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
5 matches
Mail list logo