Nathanael Nerode writes (Re: Plans for Lenny's install-info):
Make it a new install-info package. All info viewers should depend on the
package providing install-info and update-info-dir; 'info' isn't the only
info viewer. (pinfo for instance)
Package: info
Installed-Size: 328
Is it
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:47:34AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Nathanael Nerode writes (Re: Plans for Lenny's install-info):
Make it a new install-info package. All info viewers should depend on the
package providing install-info and update-info-dir; 'info' isn't the only
info viewer.
Hope Duryea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope Duryea writes (Re: Question about dpkg -r ):
dpkg did not need to create /usr (the symlink),
but it wants to -- and does -- remove it just the
same. As I mentioned before, there are plenty of
other
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow writes (Re: Question about dpkg -r):
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So this package:
usr
usr/bin
usr/bin/hello
is fine but this one:
usr/bin/hello
is wrong.
Which happens or did happen at some point.
--- Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope Duryea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you saying debian packages can only be used on
systems where the entire system is comprised
solely of things installed as debian packages?
I was hoping I could use debian packages for
Hope Duryea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Putting this stuff into /usr/local isn't an option --
but I'm a bit confused about what you mean. How is
/usr/local, if I create it myself, any different from
my creating /usr myself?
There is no package in debian containing /usr/local or anything below
--- Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope Duryea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't have a debian system. I have a system
that I had hoped I could install additional files
into, using debian packages to do that.
Then your assumptions and dpkgs assumptions collide.
It
7 matches
Mail list logo
