* scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl, scripts/dpkg-source.pl: Use new
Dpkg::Checksums module. Adds new 'Checksums-{Sha1,Sha256}' field
to .changes and .dsc files. Increase changes format to 1.8.
---
scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl | 55 ++---
scripts/dpkg-source.pl | 64
---
debian/dpkg-dev.install |1 +
scripts/Dpkg/Checksums.pm | 105 +
scripts/Makefile.am |1 +
scripts/po/POTFILES.in|1 +
4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 scripts/Dpkg/Checksums.pm
diff --g
So this is the version of the patch that implements aj's suggestions.
I still like my format better, but really only for aesthetic reasons.
The "Files" parsing should probably be factored out somehow, but I didn't
really know where to put it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
Joey Hess wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Hm, when you rename the conffile to *.dpkg-bak in pre-inst, dpkg does no
longer track the conffile (as the original conffile does no longer
exist). So how do you think, dpkg should handle that?
dpkg does continue to remember that there was an obsolete c
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:15:49PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> index 000..6bd8bf6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/man/dpkg-conffile.8
> @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
> +.\" This is an -*- nroff -*- source file.
> +.\" dpkg-conffile and this manpage are Copyright 2008 by Joey Hess.
> +.\"
> +.\" This is free software
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hm, when you rename the conffile to *.dpkg-bak in pre-inst, dpkg does no
> longer track the conffile (as the original conffile does no longer
> exist). So how do you think, dpkg should handle that?
dpkg does continue to remember that there was an obsolete conffile, even
Joey Hess wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
It was discussed briefly on debian-devel, but there is also the case
that the backup files should be cleaned up on purge.
dpkg tracks obsolete conffiles, but on removal/purge, it does not remove the
obsolete conffile. If it did, it would make sense for it
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 01:45:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 06:15:45PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> The advantage of having all that in one place means you can verify the
> hash properly with a simple script like:
Ok, I can see that.
> > So maybe keep the Checksu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:20:40 +0100
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.14.16.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers
Changed-By: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTEC
Accepted:
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.6_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.14.16.6_all.deb
dpkg_1.14.16.6.dsc
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.6.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.6.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.6_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.6_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.
dpkg_1.14.16.6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dpkg_1.14.16.6.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.6.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.6_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.6_i386.deb
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.6_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Michael Biebl wrote:
> It was discussed briefly on debian-devel, but there is also the case
> that the backup files should be cleaned up on purge.
dpkg tracks obsolete conffiles, but on removal/purge, it does not remove the
obsolete conffile. If it did, it would make sense for it to also remove
Joey Hess wrote:
As discussed on debian-devel, different versions of these conffile handling
shell functions on the wiki are being copied into maintainer scripts
repeatedly, and adding a program to dpkg that handles things is a more
maintainable approach.
It was discussed briefly on debian-dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
