Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > By contrast to old formats like tar, the git pack (and idx) formats _do_
> > contain a version number. Three versions exist: Version 1 was never
> > broadly used. ("Throw one away".) Version 3 is not generated by current
> > versions of git. Git might start generating it
Hi,
JFTR, I have filed the attached bug against devscripts.
It received bug number #476100.
(forwarding the bug manually here since the anti-BTS filters blocked the
X-Debbugs-Cc that i used)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/l
hi
recently, dpkg 1.14.17 introduces a feature
"dpkg-dev: Set a set of compiler flags for a build"
that implements what is explained in BTS 465282 .
Since not everyone reads debian-devel (too much traffic), this
may be uknown to many people; maybe you dpkg developers
should send a mail to d-
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:04:03AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Well, I wrote the manual page, so it was my decision but I believe it's
> > backed up by my opinion and the one expressed by Guillem:
> > Instead I chose to mark them as experimenta
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:04:03AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Could the maintainers clarify what criteria are used to mark a given source
> > format such as 3.0 (git) as "experimental"?
> > I hope it doesn't come down to one member of the dpkg team's p
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Helge, it would be nice if you can also take care to unfuzzy PO
> > translations as well and update the PO files in the repository as soon
> > of you commit a change to the original man pages.
>
> I heard that I have to be a little careful, so jus
6 matches
Mail list logo
