Hi,
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> > - some bugfixes (example: #476113)
> > (we can work with a RM/RA to see if a given bugfix is ok)
>
> Did see the diff of all the changes in the mean time. This one looks ok
> to include in the upload.
[...]
> > - and one particular design change in t
I recently finished off the merge of dpkg 1.14.18 into Ubuntu (yes, I
know, I should also merge 1.14.19, but I was already part-way through
this and it was easier to do that as a separate step). I went through
the entire merge line-by-line, with some assistance from Ian on IRC at
one point. Here ar
I happened to notice this chunk in the diff from 1.14.18 to 1.14.19:
-Specifies that the package is interested in the named trigger.
-All triggers in which a package is interested must be listed using
-this directive in the triggers control file.
+Specifies that the package is interested i
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 08:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> >> If you run autotools at build time you should also ensure that the
> >> changes which autotools makes are reverted in the clean target.
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 08:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Lots of other packages do this -- one of mine off the top of my head is
>> xml-security-c.
> Nope. No mention of aclocal.m4 in debian/rules for that package,
> just /usr/share/misc/config.guess a
5 matches
Mail list logo
