On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Neil Williams
>
> | Just a thought - why use /usr/lib/$ARCH and /usr/include/$ARCH at all
> | when it would (IMHO) be simpler to use /usr/$TRIPLET/ and put the entire
> | package under that, as we do with dpkg-cross currently:
>
> How
* Neil Williams
| Just a thought - why use /usr/lib/$ARCH and /usr/include/$ARCH at all
| when it would (IMHO) be simpler to use /usr/$TRIPLET/ and put the entire
| package under that, as we do with dpkg-cross currently:
How would you then handle libraries that go in /lib? (Apart from the
fact
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:44 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:03:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> So if we allow multiple packages to be installed at the same time which
> >> divert the same file, then I think we have
Phillip Susi wrote:
> I'm afraid you have it backwards. In CVS when you move a file it thinks
> you removed one file and added a totally new file somewhere else. In
> SVN, it thinks that you copied the old file to a new location, and then
> removed it. In git, the diff clearly shows fileA
Joey Hess wrote:
Phillip Susi wrote:
You tell git when you move a file and it records the fact in the change
record.
No, that's how every VCS *except* git works.
I'm afraid you have it backwards. In CVS when you move a file it thinks
you removed one file and added a totally new file somew
5 matches
Mail list logo
