On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:03:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference
between packages that
On Thu, Sep 18 2008, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Setting the environment on a distribution wide level is ugly and
fragile. Too many users will reset the environment in their .bashrc.
Instead the idea was to have a vendor (set in
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I have to say i verry rarely do not use debuild. And 99% of the
exceptions are calling debian/rules clean.
Precisely, debuild does not use dpkg-buildpackage, but call debian/rules
directly.
This has been fixed already. It calls dpkg-buildpackage
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Plus a note in policy clarifying that debian/rules is only an
interface for dpkg-buildpackage but not users.
Right. If you want to make this a rule, then we should discuss it, reach
a consensus, document and publicize the change, and so forth.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I have to say i verry rarely do not use debuild. And 99% of the
exceptions are calling debian/rules clean.
Precisely, debuild does not use dpkg-buildpackage, but call
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference
between packages that distributions wide default does not make sense.
Such change would rather lead
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:03:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference
between packages that
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I have to say i verry rarely do not use debuild. And 99% of the
exceptions are calling debian/rules clean.
Precisely, debuild does not use dpkg-buildpackage, but call debian/rules
directly.
This has been fixed already. It calls dpkg-buildpackage
Hey,
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 23:14:04 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
So I think there's two things to fix here, one is that the fseek() in
createimptmp() should be done just before the fwrite() in
modstatdb_note_core() to guarantee that we are going to be always at the
beginning, and we make
notfixed apt/0.7.15~exp1
thanks
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:10:16 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
Package: dpkg
Tags: l10n patch
Severity: wishlist
The updated Vietnamese translation for the program file: dpkg
translated and submitted by:
Clytie Siddall
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Plus a note in policy clarifying that debian/rules is only an
interface for dpkg-buildpackage but not users.
Right. If you want to make this a rule, then we should discuss it, reach
a consensus, document and publicize the change, and so forth.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I have to say i verry rarely do not use debuild. And 99% of the
exceptions are calling debian/rules clean.
Precisely, debuild does not use dpkg-buildpackage, but call
12 matches
Mail list logo
