On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:02:36AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 23:46:35 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:29, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 18:15:12 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
dpkg --remove libc6
Hello dpkg-ers,
Thanks for the comments so far, they were really useful.
I start to see some light. I report on my ideas to let you know that I'm
working on it, and to get some feedback, if possible.
On 2011/12/07 08:05AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[...]
Basically you must ensure that the
This e-mail has been sent due to an upload to Ubuntu that contains Ubuntu
changes. It contains the difference between the new version and the
previous version of the same source package in Ubuntu.Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:33:28 +0100
Source: dpkg
Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev
Hello,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Gianluca Ciccarelli wrote:
I've read dpkg-maintscript-helper's man page. We want some commands in
the script, invoked by the maintainer scripts always as:
dpkg-maintscript-helper my_command_name options \
-- $@
that executes differently according to the value
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:02, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
Even then, as I stated on my initial mail, if we ignore the
cross-grade case, let's consider the situation of a system with just a
i386 essential package set, where an amd64 apt (and needed dependencies)
have just been
Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:21:13 +0100
with message-id 20111215092113.gb24...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
and subject line Re: Bug#652113: dpkg-dev: dpkg-source -x does not work
has caused the Debian Bug report #652113,
regarding dpkg-dev: dpkg-source -x does not work
to be marked as
tags 652063 + patch
thanks
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Martin Pitt wrote:
But I'm filing it here because
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632555#20 referred to
it and to have an early warning before that dpkg branch lands in
Debian. If you consider that inappropriate, then please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 652063 + patch
Bug #652063 [dpkg] When installing Multi-Arch: same (meta-)package for two
architectures, dpkg considers one arch as completely disappeared
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hello Raphaël ,
Raphael Hertzog [2011-12-15 10:35 +0100]:
Yeah, that's not correct. The attached patch should fix this. It's
untested though and it would be great if you could confirm that it works
as expected.
I just tested it, and it works perfectly. Many thanks!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
Hi Raphael,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:02:21PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011, Kees Cook wrote:
This patch adds that ability, and lets the environment correctly adjust it:
$ dpkg-buildflags --features hardening
-bindnow,+format,+fortify,-pie,+relro,+stackprotector
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 652026 dpkg
Bug #652026 [amavisd-new] amavisd-new: Init-script not working (stop/restart)
Bug #649358 [amavisd-new] amavisd-new: invoke-rc.d amavis stop doesn't find
amavisd daemon
Bug reassigned from package 'amavisd-new' to 'dpkg'.
Bug
11 matches
Mail list logo
