On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:53:19PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > (I'd currently tend to accept it, however I'm not yet sure of all the
> > consequences of this change.)
> This change in itself should not have any consequence as it should not
> affect the normal build if the value is not being use
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> in this example:
>> Package: foobar
>> Architecture: amd64
>> Depends: package-bar
>> that last line is in fact read as:
>> Depends: package-bar:amd64
>
> Why? I don't think that would help humans any more than rea
David Kalnischkies wrote:
> in this example:
> Package: foobar
> Architecture: amd64
> Depends: package-bar
> that last line is in fact read as:
> Depends: package-bar:amd64
Why? I don't think that would help humans any more than reading it as
Depends: package-b
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Let me try again. I believe that a dependency like this:
>
> Depends: package-foo:i386
>
> is referring to a specific, concrete, non-virtual package package-foo
> and it doesn't make sense to allow this to be satisfied by virtual
>
David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I agree here. If I understand correctly, you are saying that it would
>> be best if a dependency
>>
>> Package: a
>> Depends: phonon-backend
>>
>> should only be satisfied by a package from an
Charles Plessy, 2012-07-14 02:48+0200 (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general):
> As the logic applied to the changelog and copyright files can be applied to
> most other files produced by the packager, like NEWS.Debian, it looks like the
> trend would be to have them installed in /var/lib/dpkg rather th
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 14:25:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:07:00AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > I just verified a build in stable and get a bunch of these:
> > >
> > > dpkg-source --after-build hello-2.6
> > > parsech
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 14:25:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:07:00AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > > #681292 against sbuild. Feel free to clone it if necessary.
> > > I just verified a build in stable and get a bunch of th
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:07:00AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > #681292 against sbuild. Feel free to clone it if necessary.
> > I just verified a build in stable and get a bunch of these:
> >
> > dpkg-source --after-build hello-2.6
> > parsechange
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> As an example:
>> I highly doubt "phonon:amd64" with a dependency on "phonon-backend" will
>> work with "phonon-backend-vlc:armel" which provides "phonon-backend".
>>
>> If phonon-backend would be a normal pack
10 matches
Mail list logo
