Re: propagating the value of the build-profiles field to Packages and Sources files

2014-03-07 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi :) Quoting Guillem Jover (2014-03-07 22:34:15) > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 15:57:53 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > The problem might lie in the fact that I do not understand how "profiles > > the binary package gets produced for" is different from "profiles the > > binary package supports or ca

Re: propagating the value of the build-profiles field to Packages and Sources files

2014-03-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hey! On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 15:57:53 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Guillem Jover (2014-03-07 03:18:54) > > Ok, just to clarify what we are talking about, and which recently realized > > (after having seen the debhelper implementation) I might have misunderstood > > the proposed purpose o

Re: propagating the value of the build-profiles field to Packages and Sources files

2014-03-07 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Guillem, Quoting Guillem Jover (2014-03-07 03:18:54) > Ok, just to clarify what we are talking about, and which recently realized > (after having seen the debhelper implementation) I might have misunderstood > the proposed purpose of the field in the past, and think I might have already > said

Ubuntu dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5

2014-03-07 Thread Ubuntu Merge-o-Matic
This e-mail has been sent due to an upload to Ubuntu that contains Ubuntu changes. It contains the difference between the new version and the previous version of the same source package in Ubuntu.Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:47:57 +0800 Source: dpkg Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev libdp