Russ,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paul Hardy writes:
>
> > Osamu: I did not mean just accept one format--I meant accept both ".asc"
> > and ".sig" files for ".changes", ".dsc", and uscan files. I suppose all
> > three manuals you mentioned could be modified to docume
Paul Hardy writes:
> Osamu: I did not mean just accept one format--I meant accept both ".asc"
> and ".sig" files for ".changes", ".dsc", and uscan files. I suppose all
> three manuals you mentioned could be modified to document this.
> I had not brought this up until the latest lintian check on
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 00:25:11 +0200
Source: debsig-verify
Binary: debsig-verify
Architecture: source
Version: 0.17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers
Changed-By: Guillem Jover
Description:
debsig-verify_0.17_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debsig-verify_0.17.dsc
debsig-verify_0.17.tar.xz
debsig-verify_0.17_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> ...
> > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 20:26:41 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> > > Also, where signature files are desired, I think it would be
> beneficial to
> > > also accept binary
Hi everyone,
(I CCed -devel and deity, but we probably should just discuss
that on -dpkg)
while breakfast here at DebConf, the topic of delta upgrades
came up. I think delta debs are generally a thing we should
aim to have, but debdelta is not the implementation we want:
* It is not integrated
6 matches
Mail list logo
