Hi!
On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 22:14:24 +0200, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly wrote:
> I am puzzled.
>
> dpkg/man/dpkg.pod:
> The primary and more user-friendly
> front-end for B is B(8).
>
> dpkg/README:
> The primary interface for the dpkg suite is the ‘dselect’ program;
> a more low-level
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:14:24PM +0200, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am puzzled.
>
> dpkg/man/dpkg.pod:
> The primary and more user-friendly
> front-end for B is B(8).
>
> dpkg/README:
> The primary interface for the dpkg suite is the ‘dselect’ program;
> a
Hello,
I am puzzled.
dpkg/man/dpkg.pod:
The primary and more user-friendly
front-end for B is B(8).
dpkg/README:
The primary interface for the dpkg suite is the ‘dselect’ program;
a more low-level and less user-friendly interface is available in
the form of the ‘dpkg’ command.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 02:14:09PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 12:32:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'm working on a project where inline signatures on Debian-style
>> packages would be very useful, so I've started playing with debsigs
>> and debsig-verify. Both
Hi!
On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 12:32:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm working on a project where inline signatures on Debian-style
> packages would be very useful, so I've started playing with debsigs
> and debsig-verify. Both packages *appear* to be maintained, with
> uploads during the Bullseye
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2021 13:51:31 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#988646: debsig-verify doesn't work with gpg2-format
keyrings
has caused the Debian Bug report #988646,
regarding debsig-verify doesn't work with gpg2-format keyrings
to be marked as done.
This means that
[ Added Peter on CC in case he's not reading the -dpkg list ]
Hi folks,
I'm working on a project where inline signatures on Debian-style
packages would be very useful, so I've started playing with debsigs
and debsig-verify. Both packages *appear* to be maintained, with
uploads during the
Package: debsig-verify
Version: 0.19+b10
Severity: important
Hi!
[ Reporting against version 0.19+b10 in buster, but I've tested with
0.23 and it shows exactly the same issue. ]
I've been trying to use debsigs and debsig-verify for a project, and
things are not going well.
When testing with
8 matches
Mail list logo