Hi,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:34:06AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> At some point the question becomes: Do we want that complexity inside
> dpkg (aka DEP 17 or some variant of it) or outside of dpkg (i.e. what
> we're talking about here). It seems clear at this time, that complexity
> is unavoid
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 07:11:10AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Simon" == Simon McVittie writes:
>
> Simon> You might reasonably say that "the maintainer of bar didn't
> Simon> add the correct Breaks/Replaces on foo" is a RC bug in bar -
> Simon> and it is! - but judging by the
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 09:07:28PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> In sincerely hope that this fixed-up plan doesn't have any serious
> issues. If you find any please tell.
Thanks for the praise, but problems I found and I'm pretty sure this is
only the tip of the iceberg.
So for one thing, let us
On 2023-04-26 10:34 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 10:11, Simon Richter wrote:
>>
>> What I'm mostly concerned about (read: have not verified either way)
>> with /lib/ld.so and /bin/sh is what happens when dpkg learns of /bin and
>> /lib as symlinks -- because right now, the
Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 19:08, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 01:06:18PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 11:50, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:29:33PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > After Bookworm ships I plan to
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Brilliant! Would never have thought of using divert like that.
+1 Nice trick.
> So, what work would need to happen to make this reality? Do we need
> tooling/scripts/build changes to support the divert scheme, or is it
> "simply" a matter of documenting
> "Simon" == Simon McVittie writes:
Simon> You might reasonably say that "the maintainer of bar didn't
Simon> add the correct Breaks/Replaces on foo" is a RC bug in bar -
Simon> and it is! - but judging by the number of "missing
Simon> Breaks/Replaces" bug reports that have to
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 10:11, Simon Richter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 09:07:28PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> > This and /bin/sh is the kind of files I'd consider important. And then
> > upon thinking further it became more and more difficult for me to make
> > sense of the obj
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 09:07:28PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> This and /bin/sh is the kind of files I'd consider important. And then
> upon thinking further it became more and more difficult for me to make
> sense of the objection. On a merged system, we can just move that file
> to its ca
9 matches
Mail list logo
