Re: booststrapping /usr-merged systems

2023-06-10 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 at 09:40, Helmut Grohne wrote: > My takeaway here is that while I see the protective diversion as the > "obviously superior solution", this clearly is not consensus at this > time. It also means that when rewriting DEP 17, I need to spend quite a > bit of text on rationale. Tha

Re: booststrapping /usr-merged systems

2023-06-10 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2023-06-10 10:39 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:35:44AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> > Unfortunately, any >> > external package that still ships stuff in /bin breaks this. In effect, >> > any addon repository or old package can break your system. >> >> Yo

Re: booststrapping /usr-merged systems

2023-06-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Sven, On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:35:44AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > Unfortunately, any > > external package that still ships stuff in /bin breaks this. In effect, > > any addon repository or old package can break your system. > > You lost me. We have converted /bin to a symlink already, h