Le Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:10:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 09:14:09AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> > Le Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:41:59AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> > >
> > > If I end up with time to work on it, wha
Le Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 09:14:09AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:41:59AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> >
> > If I end up with time to work on it, what I would probably do is to
> > split the patch into smaller changes that can be consi
do not understand why there is so
much reluctance in enhancing our documentation.
Have a nice Sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>From 5d3279e10152d6ecb8b2b4bf226f7e7a380228e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Plessy
Date: Sun,
Le Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:00:55AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> does the current patch (attached) address your concerns ? If yes, would
> you second it ?
Hi all,
I would like to make one more call for feedback.
Needless to say, I am annoyed that despite we had mutiple pe
Le Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:58:04PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:27:19 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > About the problem of triggers being called with Depends not satisfied,
> >
e
> (similar to what Pre-Depends ensures for preinst
> maintainer scripts).
> I maintain my second provided that you fix the above.
Great, and thanks for your suggestion, which I will apply.
More seconds or objections from others ? What are the other Policy editors
thinking about t
Raphaël confirms that he still
seconds the patch, I would much appreciate if I could either have support or
actionable objection from others (preferably in the form of "unless X is done,
the patch should not be applied", rather than "it would be good to do Y").
Have a nice
Thanks again Raphaël for your prompt feedback.
Le Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:00:44AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > - "postinst configure" should do at least everything needed by
> >"postinst t
Hello everybody,
here is a tiny patch to dpkg(1), to add the "triggers" files to the list of
files found in binary packages.
Please let me know if you prefer receiving it through the BTS.
Cheers,
-- Charles
From: Charles Plessy
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:39:18 +0900
Subject: [P
Le Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:55:20AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> 2) The section "Details - triggered package" mentions that "packages in
> ‘config-failed’ or worse are never considered to have lists of pending
> triggers". (Where config-fail
Le Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:55:20AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> regarding “noawait” triggers, the patch already contains the following, which
> is new and improved compared to the existing documentation.
>
> The *-noawait directives should be used unless the
>
ed to clear the list of pending
triggers when monodoc-browser became unpacked when it was upgraded.
Is that correct ? If yes, then I propose to go ahead and apply an improved
patch to the policy that mentions the restrictions and requirements on
"postinst triggers", because it represents a
Le Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:09:08PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:26:01 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=87;filename=policy-triggers.diff;att=1;bug=582109
> >
> That patch h
tag 582109 patch
thanks
Le Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:26:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> now that Wheezy is released, I hope that everybody has more time to review the
> patch to integrate triggers in the Policy and confirm Raphaël's seconding or
> propose extra correction
Le Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:09:17AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Sun, 12 May 2013, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > I also added "through the interst or activate directives"
> > after "When a configured package activates a trigger".
> >
>
e it gets futher
proof-reading and seconds. Or if it takes time, shall I point to this bug log
on -devel ?
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Hi Raphaël,
thanks for the quick feedback.
In the list of directives, I have moved the "noawait" variant on top to
better show that they are the default choice. I also reworded your suggestion
to make it a positive recommenation: use "interest" and "activate" only
if you want to put the triggeri
Le Tue, May 07, 2013 at 08:44:03PM +0200, Guillem Jover a écrit :
>
> interest → interest-noawait
> activate → activate-noawait
>
> supported by the dpkg in stable, which in addition should produce easier
> upgrade paths.
Hi,
this is being fixed for mime-support in its version 3.54.
Have a
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:07:19PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> Here are my comments. There's quite a bit of work left.
Thanks a lot Raphaël and everybody !
I think that I took care of all of your comments.
Here is an updated patch. Among the changes, it introduces
sub-section to make
Le Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:11:19AM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 08:37:25 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I am still seeking comments for the attached patch, that describes Dpkg
> > triggers.
>
> I've not yet allocated a chunk of time to take a
Hello everybody,
I am still seeking comments for the attached patch, that describes Dpkg
triggers.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
>From 6a7fd0e49cb8dbd025771feb95c2dcafb408c1b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Plessy
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 22:48:04 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Document d
n. Can you do the same in the manual pages ?
For the markup of the state names, while I am not completely satisfied with
having them flanked with quotes instead of either italics or monospaced, I
think that we can defer this to the next major release of the Policy.
I attached an updated patch.
rom: Charles Plessy
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 22:48:04 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Document dpkg triggers.
Closes: #582109.
---
policy.sgml | 280 ++--
1 file changed, 273 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index d818
Le Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:41:55PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> I am having a look at how to document triggers. In order to simplify the
> explanation and re-use more easily material from the file above, I think
> that we would benefit from documenting the dpkg states for a p
e please let me know.
I wonder where to add this information: either in chapter 3 (binary packages)
or chapter 6 (Package maintainer scripts and installation procedure).
What do you think ?
Have a nice Sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
rhaps even to update
(like for translations).
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.or
Le Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:17:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Here is a new proposed patch that incorporates the feedback to date with
> some other, substantial changes.
> Due to the reformatting, the diff is even longer and is now really just
> the complete removal of the current shlibs sect
> - dpkg-shlibdeps - calculates shared library
> - dependencies
> -
I propose to keep a placeholder so that the next subsections are not
renumbered. Once all these sections are trimmed, we could consider removing
the appendix altogether.
Have a nice day,
--
Le Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:14:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> here is a patch that updates §9.10: now that doc-base uses triggers, I think
> it
> is better to simply recommend to install the control files in
> /usr/share/doc-base/, instead of recommending the use of ins
Le Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:13:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy writes:
>
> > how about simply paraphrasing the RFC 822/5832, which our the source of
> > inspiration ? In that case, the requirement for field names will be to
> > be printable ASCII c
he
value and is ignored there; it is conventional to put a
single space after the colon. For example, a field might
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
ore and that will complain against the substvar. But it
should be easy to desensitize it to substvars, which would restore compliance
with our Policy.
Have a nice day
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Hi again,
Le Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:08:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Clearly the format 2.0 has been implemented as an academic exercise
Then please do not ask for feedback on it. I am happy to spend time for
you but not if it
kg-buildpackage: set CXXFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: source package glam2
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1058-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture powerpc
fakeroot debian/rules clean
test -x debian/
34 matches
Mail list logo
