On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:36:28PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > [1] checking the multi-arch status of the package's previous version to
> > determine the conffiledb path at appropriate points in the code,
> > assuming that can be done.
>
> I have not looked into details but I don't se
On Mon, 09 May 2011, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:05:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The control files are installed as .foo except for Multi-Arch: same
> > which are installed as :.foo.
> >
> > It's probably a good idea to reuse the same logic here.
>
> If a package mig
hiya,
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:05:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 08 May 2011, sean finney wrote:
> > I'd think that only one instance of arch:all could be installed, but I
> > haven't read the details of how we're doing multi-arch so perhaps someone
> > with better insights could c
On Sun, 08 May 2011, sean finney wrote:
> I'd think that only one instance of arch:all could be installed, but I
> haven't read the details of how we're doing multi-arch so perhaps someone
> with better insights could confirm/clarify?
The control files are installed as .foo except for Multi-Arch:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:58:46AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > I think pkg:arch would suffice instead of pkg, right?
>
> Yes, probably. I'm not sure whether arch:all packages are currently
> tied to a specific arch.
I'd think that only one instance of arch:all could be installed, but I
hav
sean finney wrote:
> I think pkg:arch would suffice instead of pkg, right?
Yes, probably. I'm not sure whether arch:all packages are currently
tied to a specific arch.
> Yeah, I think previous versions of the patch series had "new", "old",
> "tmp", "cur" or similarly named directories, and vari
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:59:52AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ah, memories. The main piece to revisit might be what sort of
> identifier to use for in these modern days of multiarch. I also
I think pkg:arch would suffice instead of pkg, right?
> think there was some talk about atomic rena
From: Sean Finney
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:27:32 +0100
(Note: this information is largely duplicative of the doxygen documentation
comments, found in conffiledb.c and conffiledb.h)
The files conffiledb.{c,h} define a set of routines for adding and removing
stored versions of "pristine" conffile
hi guillem,
i'll try to answer these in order, here's the first to look over
while i start looking over the next.
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 08:27:32 +0100, Sean Finney wrote:
> > The layout pattern for the conffile database is:
> >
> >
Hi Sean!
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 08:27:32 +0100, Sean Finney wrote:
> The layout pattern for the conffile database is:
>
> /conffiles///
While the implementation resulting from this layout seems more elegant
than the previous iteration, I still think that using the layout I
described in the
(Note: this information is largely duplicative of the doxygen documentation
comments, found in conffiledb.c and conffiledb.h)
The files conffiledb.{c,h} define a set of routines for adding and removing
stored versions of "pristine" conffile versions as shipped in their respective
packages.
Such a
11 matches
Mail list logo
