Re: A radically different proposal for differential updates

2017-08-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! While this sounds indeed interesting, I think it's impractical for at least the two reason below: On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 09:26:24 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > AFAQ (Anticipated frequently asked questions): > > Q: How can you reconstruct a tarball from the installed system? Won't >

Re: A radically different proposal for differential updates

2017-08-15 Thread Peter Silva
Isn't there kind of a universal issue that tar and compression happen sort of in the wrong order? Wouldn't it make more sense to make files that were .gz.tar (ie. compress the files individually, then have an index into them via tar.) Then tar works perfectly well for extracting individual files

Re: A radically different proposal for differential updates

2017-08-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:26:24AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi there, > > I've come to believe that binary diff packages are not the best way of > solving this issue. Intead I'd like to propse a radically different > solution to this issue. > > The gist of it: instead of adding a format

A radically different proposal for differential updates

2017-08-15 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi there, I've come to believe that binary diff packages are not the best way of solving this issue. Intead I'd like to propse a radically different solution to this issue. The gist of it: instead of adding a format for how deltas work, I propose to introduce a new format for storing Debian