On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 01:20, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 01:07:59 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 03.05.24 11:27, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:27:02AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > > Some of the above problems could perhaps be avoided if we
On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 01:07:59 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.24 11:27, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:27:02AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Some of the above problems could perhaps be avoided if we introduced
> > > a concept of architecture aliases/ISAs
On 03.05.24 11:27, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:27:02AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:43:55 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Recently the topic of exploiting newer instructions without dropping
support for older machines has come up
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:27:02AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:43:55 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > Recently the topic of exploiting newer instructions without dropping
> > support for older machines has come up several times inside Ubuntu
> >
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 02:02:37PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 15:27:54 +, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 09:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > This can be used among other things to set up foreign chroots, by
> > > running the host tools,
On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 at 02:02, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 15:27:54 +, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 09:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > This can be used among other things to set up foreign chroots, by
> > > running the host tools, so
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 15:27:54 +, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 09:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > This can be used among other things to set up foreign chroots, by
> > running the host tools, so disallowing installation could be
> > problematic. Even though I guess
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 09:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 14:43:42 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > Thanks for the considered response. And sorry for the very slow reply.
>
> Idem! :)
>
> > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 21:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > I'm not sure I
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 14:43:42 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Thanks for the considered response. And sorry for the very slow reply.
Idem! :)
> On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 21:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'm not sure I entirely agree with the requirements you set forth
> > though:
> >
> >
On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 21:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
Hi!
Thanks for the considered response. And sorry for the very slow reply.
> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:43:55 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > Recently the topic of exploiting newer instructions without dropping
> > support for
Hi!
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:43:55 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Recently the topic of exploiting newer instructions without dropping
> support for older machines has come up several times inside Ubuntu
> engineering. I understand this topic has come up several times in the past
> for
Hi,
Recently the topic of exploiting newer instructions without dropping
support for older machines has come up several times inside Ubuntu
engineering. I understand this topic has come up several times in the past
for Debian as well, but nothing has really come of it to date.
I've spent a while
12 matches
Mail list logo
