On 3 September 2012 19:53, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
> Otherwise we need to clone this to aptitude (as it does some direct dpkg
> calling on its own as far as I know) and whatever other dpkg front-end assumed
> that it could arch-qualify everything in a multi-arch universe.
David, any chance of g
Control: clone 686346 -2
Control: reassign -2 aptitude
Control: retitle -1 apt: Should not arch-qualify arch-less packages on dpkg
calls
Control: retitle -2 aptitude: Should not arch-qualfy arch-less packages on dpkg
calls
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 01:41:36 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-09
On 2012-09-03 21:05:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: clone -1 aptitude
>
> [ CCing aptitude due to the clone, please see the bug report for more
> details, also about it probably deserving to be serious. ]
The clone still isn't in the BTS while there are more recent bugs
than 2012-09-0
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 13:53:47 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> > So it would seem to me the arch-qualifying logic in apt is not right,
>> > it really only ever needs to arch-qualify
Control: clone -1 aptitude
[ CCing aptitude due to the clone, please see the bug report for more
details, also about it probably deserving to be serious. ]
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 13:53:47 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > So it would se
(cc'ing debian-dpkg@ as this possibly is a problem for any dpkg user)
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> So it would seem to me the arch-qualifying logic in apt is not right,
> it really only ever needs to arch-qualify if:
>
> * dpkg supports --assert-multi-arch
> AND
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
