Re: Evaluation (Re: Proposal: A new approach to differential debs)

2017-08-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-08-16 00:21:09 [+0200], Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > libreoffice-core (size only): > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 29M Jul 22 20:02 > > libreoffice-core_5.3.5~rc1-3_amd64.deb > > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 31M Jul

Re: Evaluation (Re: Proposal: A new approach to differential debs)

2017-08-22 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2017-08-16 00:21:09 [+0200], Julian Andres Klode wrote: > libreoffice-core (size only): > > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 29M Jul 22 20:02 libreoffice-core_5.3.5~rc1-3_amd64.deb > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 31M Jul 16 00:10 libreoffice-core_5.4.0~rc2-1_amd64.deb > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 31M Jul 28 18:29

Re: Evaluation (Re: Proposal: A new approach to differential debs)

2017-08-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:21:09AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > firefox (size & performance): > > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 2.3M Aug 15 20:59 firefox_55.0-1_55.0-2_amd64.debdelta > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 2.4M Aug 15 22:13 firefox_55.0-1_55.0-2_amd64.pdeb > -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 7.4M Aug 15

Evaluation (Re: Proposal: A new approach to differential debs)

2017-08-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 02:16:21PM -0400, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Hi everyone, > > (I CCed -devel and deity, but we probably should just discuss > that on -dpkg) > > while breakfast here at DebConf, the topic of delta upgrades > came up. I think delta debs are generally a thing we should >