Hi,
On 2023-06-27 03:16, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> On 2023-06-15 11:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > AFAIR there was also the case of objects being annotated with
> > Tag_ABI_VFP_args but not with either of the ABI hard or soft float
> > flags.
>
> Indeed, there are 1 armel and 91 armhf binary packages
Hi,
On 2023-06-28 01:41, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-06-16 at 11:19:21 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > are written in
> > Pascal. It seems that fpc just emits the wrong flags. As an example,
> > here is the readelf output for the armhf version of cqrlog. Note that
> > Tag_ABI_VFP_args is
Hi!
On Fri, 2023-06-16 at 11:19:21 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> I did a first pass, and it seems that the only objects with Version4 are
> generated by tcc.
>
> Flags according to readelf -h on armel:
> 0x4000200, Version4 EABI,
>
> And on armhf:
> 0x4000400, Version4 EABI,
>
> For refere
Hi,
On 2023-06-15 11:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> AFAIR there was also the case of objects being annotated with
> Tag_ABI_VFP_args but not with either of the ABI hard or soft float
> flags.
Indeed, there are 1 armel and 91 armhf binary packages shipping ELF
files without float flags (hard or soft)
On 2023-06-21, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> On 2023-06-16 11:19, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> (1) I couldn't find any armel object with the hard-float flag set.
>
> (2) There are a few armhf packages shipping files with the soft-float flag.
>
> All of them, with the exception of the u-boot packages, are writ
On 2023-06-16 11:19, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> I'll look at the soft/hard float ones next.
Two findings.
(1) I couldn't find any armel object with the hard-float flag set.
(2) There are a few armhf packages shipping files with the soft-float flag.
All of them, with the exception of the u-boot pac
Hey,
On 2023-06-15 11:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> AFAIR there was also the case of objects being annotated with
> Tag_ABI_VFP_args but not with either of the ABI hard or soft float
> flags. And rechecking the commit message, it seems there were also
> objects with both ABI float flags set at the sa
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 14:56:21 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> On 2023-04-27 11:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I was recently working on the Dpkg::Shlibs::Objdump module code
> > related to ELF and ABI tracking, and when seeing the ARM handling
> > missing there, recalled the issues we saw some t
Hi Guillem,
On 2023-04-27 11:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I was recently working on the Dpkg::Shlibs::Objdump module code
> related to ELF and ABI tracking, and when seeing the ARM handling
> missing there, recalled the issues we saw some time ago with ARM
> when I tried to make that tracking more s
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 23:16:16 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2023-05-03 21:50 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > If we're still seeing
> > issues in packages today, then maybe we might find some help from
> > Wookey or Emmanuel (who should both be reading this list!).
>
> I am, and have noticed thi
On 2023-05-03 21:50 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> If we're still seeing
> issues in packages today, then maybe we might find some help from
> Wookey or Emmanuel (who should both be reading this list!).
I am, and have noticed this issue and put it on our list of things to look
at. I was going to w
Hey Guillem!
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:27:47PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi Steve!
>
>I was recently working on the Dpkg::Shlibs::Objdump module code
>related to ELF and ABI tracking, and when seeing the ARM handling
>missing there, recalled the issues we saw some time ago with ARM
>when I tri
Hi Steve!
I was recently working on the Dpkg::Shlibs::Objdump module code
related to ELF and ABI tracking, and when seeing the ARM handling
missing there, recalled the issues we saw some time ago with ARM
when I tried to make that tracking more strict, which had to be
reverted due to issues with o
13 matches
Mail list logo
