Hi,
Quoting Guillem Jover (2015-06-26 06:30:39)
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:31:05 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > Some people suggested that we should record a checksum of the `.deb`
> > installed as a way to unambiguously referring to a specific package.
>
> In principle the tuple pkgname-version
Hi!
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:31:05 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Some people suggested that we should record a checksum of the `.deb`
> installed as a way to unambiguously referring to a specific package.
In principle the tuple pkgname-version-arch should be unique per
archive, otherwise bad-thin
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> But, as far as I know, this information is currently not recorded by
> dpkg and there is no way to know for sure which `.deb` has been used for
> a package currently installed. I have a couple of memories where this
> could have been
On Tue 2015-06-23 03:31:05 -0400, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Some people suggested that we should record a checksum of the `.deb`
> installed as a way to unambiguously referring to a specific package.
> The main benefit that I can think of is that it would allow to directly
> retrieve the file from sn
Hi!
While thinking one more time about the current specification for
`.buildinfo` files [1], I remembered one unresolved question.
The `Build-Environment` field currently has the same syntax as
`Built-Using`: a list of packages and their exact version. This works
fine but might not be optimal.
S
5 matches
Mail list logo
